Prenatal diagnosis · 2008
Prenatal testing for a novel EBP missense mutation causing X-linked dominant chondrodysplasia punctata.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tysoe Carolyn, Law Caroline J, Caswell Richard, Clayton Peter, Ellard Sian
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the pathogenicity of a novel conserved missense mutation, p.Ser98Phe, in the emopamil binding protein (EBP) gene in order to perform a prenatal diagnostic test for X-linked dominant chondrodysplasia punctata (CDPX2) in a male foetus at 50% risk.
METHODS: Family members were tested for p.Ser98Phe using PCR and sequence analysis of leucocyte or buccal cell DNA. Haplotype analysis was employed to identify the grandparental chromosome on which p.Ser98Phe had arisen. In silico protein analyses were used to predict whether p.Ser98Phe significantly altered the EBP protein structure.
RESULTS: The mutation was detected in the proband and her affected mother but not in the maternal grandmother, who was thought to be mildly affected. However, haplotype analysis showed that p.Ser98Phe had arisen de novo on the grandpaternal X chromosome. Protein secondary structure predictions suggested that p.Ser98Phe alters the properties of the helix within which it is located.
CONCLUSION: We concluded that p.Ser98Phe is likely to be pathogenic and proceeded with prenatal testing. The male foetus had not inherited p.Ser98Phe and his unaffected status was confirmed at birth. This family demonstrates some of the difficulties in interpreting the significance of novel missense mutations, particularly when results are needed urgently for prenatal diagnosis.
METHODS: Family members were tested for p.Ser98Phe using PCR and sequence analysis of leucocyte or buccal cell DNA. Haplotype analysis was employed to identify the grandparental chromosome on which p.Ser98Phe had arisen. In silico protein analyses were used to predict whether p.Ser98Phe significantly altered the EBP protein structure.
RESULTS: The mutation was detected in the proband and her affected mother but not in the maternal grandmother, who was thought to be mildly affected. However, haplotype analysis showed that p.Ser98Phe had arisen de novo on the grandpaternal X chromosome. Protein secondary structure predictions suggested that p.Ser98Phe alters the properties of the helix within which it is located.
CONCLUSION: We concluded that p.Ser98Phe is likely to be pathogenic and proceeded with prenatal testing. The male foetus had not inherited p.Ser98Phe and his unaffected status was confirmed at birth. This family demonstrates some of the difficulties in interpreting the significance of novel missense mutations, particularly when results are needed urgently for prenatal diagnosis.