The Impact of Timing of Tympanostomy Tube Placement on Sequelae in Children With Cleft Palate.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To describe the impact of timing of tympanostomy tube insertion on the number of tubes received and complications in children with routine tube placement.
DESIGN
Retrospective case series.
SETTING
Tertiary care children's hospital.
PARTICIPANTS
Records from a consecutive sample of 401 children with cleft palate were reviewed. Sixty-five patients with isolated cleft palate and 82 patients with cleft lip and palate had follow-up until 5 years of age and were included.
INTERVENTIONS: Tympanostomy tubes.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of tubes received and tube-related complications. The hypothesis was formulated prior to data collection.
RESULTS
Males comprised 55.8% of included patients, and tubes were placed in 98.6% of patients at a median age of 6.5 months. Effusion was documented at first tube placement for 96.5% of patients. Most (67.4%) patients required replacement of tubes, and 10.6% required long-term tubes. Complications included otorrhea (71.0%), myringosclerosis (35.2%), granulation (22.8%), perforation (17.9%), retained tubes (5.5%), and cholesteatoma (1.4%). Cleft lip and palate (P < .001) and otorrhea (P = .023) were associated with tube placement before palatoplasty. Patients with tube placement before palatoplasty (P = .033), genetic disorders (P = .007), failed newborn hearing screen (P = .012), otorrhea (P < .001), and granulation (P < .001) received more tubes.
CONCLUSIONS
Nearly universal effusion in patients with cleft palate supports the need for routine tube placement. The potential for otorrhea and requiring more tubes should be weighed against the risks associated with prolonged effusion when considering tube placement before palatoplasty.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.