MedElevator
Войти в исследования Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology · 2008
[Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting by metoclopramide combined with dexamethasone in gynecological surgery].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nonaka Akihiko, Suzuki Satomi, Tamaki Fumimasa, Furuya Atsushi, Abe Fumiaki, Matsukawa Takashi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated the efficacy of a combination of dexamethasone and metoclopramide for the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after gynecological abdominal surgery.
METHODS: One-hundred and seventeen patients scheduled for gynecological abdominal surgery were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were classified into three groups by anti-emetics administered; none (Group C, n = 38); metoclopramide 10 mg (Group M, n = 39); or a combination of metoclopramide 10 mg with dexamethasone 8 mg (Group MD, n = 40) at 30 to 60 minutes prior to the end of surgery. Anesthesia was induced by propofol and maintained with isoflurane-nitrous oxide inhalation and intermittent administration of fentanyl. Postoperative pain was treated with continuous subcutaneous infusion of pentazocine via a patient controlled analgesia device. PONV was assessed using a 5 rating verbal score in early (0-6 hr) and in late (6-24 hr) period.
RESULTS: The 3 groups were similar in demographic characteristics. The incidence of nausea and vomiting in early period was significantly lower in Group MD compared with Group C and Group M. Rescue anti-emetic requirements were fewer in Group MD compared with Group C. There are no severe complications.
CONCLUSIONS: A combination of metoclopramide and dexamethasone was more effective in preventing PONV compared with metoclopramide alone.
METHODS: One-hundred and seventeen patients scheduled for gynecological abdominal surgery were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were classified into three groups by anti-emetics administered; none (Group C, n = 38); metoclopramide 10 mg (Group M, n = 39); or a combination of metoclopramide 10 mg with dexamethasone 8 mg (Group MD, n = 40) at 30 to 60 minutes prior to the end of surgery. Anesthesia was induced by propofol and maintained with isoflurane-nitrous oxide inhalation and intermittent administration of fentanyl. Postoperative pain was treated with continuous subcutaneous infusion of pentazocine via a patient controlled analgesia device. PONV was assessed using a 5 rating verbal score in early (0-6 hr) and in late (6-24 hr) period.
RESULTS: The 3 groups were similar in demographic characteristics. The incidence of nausea and vomiting in early period was significantly lower in Group MD compared with Group C and Group M. Rescue anti-emetic requirements were fewer in Group MD compared with Group C. There are no severe complications.
CONCLUSIONS: A combination of metoclopramide and dexamethasone was more effective in preventing PONV compared with metoclopramide alone.