Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
Comparative Physicochemical Characterization and Biological Effects of Magnetite- and Maghemite-Based Magnetic Colloidal Suspensions in A704 Renal Cancer Cells.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Neagu Mihai Cristian, Haj Ali Diana, Iacob Emil Radu, Smeu Andreea, Stoicescu Roxana, Popoiu Călin Marius, Boştinaru Georgiana, Marcu Ştefan, Ianoş Robert, Socoliuc Vlad, Barbu Tudoran Lucian, Moacă Elena-Alina
Аннотация
Background/Objectives: Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles are investigated in cancer research; however, the direct biological effects of unloaded magnetic colloidal suspensions in renal cancer remain insufficiently characterized. This study compared two double-oleic-acid-coated formulations prepared from precursors: magnetite-based MCS 1 and maghemite-based MCS 2. Methods: The suspensions were characterized by vibrating-sample magnetometry, dynamic light scattering, bright-field scanning transmission electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Their effects on A704 renal adenocarcinoma cells were evaluated after 24 h of exposure to 1-5 µg/mL using MTT, neutral red uptake, JC-1, Hoechst 33342/MitoTracker Red CMXRos, acridine orange/propidium iodide staining, and a 7-day clonogenic assay. Results: MCS 2 showed higher volumetric saturation magnetization (1.541 vs. 1.059 Gs), a smaller Z-average hydrodynamic diameter (79.65 vs. 103.9 nm), and a more uniform volume-weighted distribution. Both formulations significantly reduced metabolic activity and neutral red uptake and induced mitochondrial depolarization, cell-death-associated morphological changes, and impaired clonogenic capacity. MCS 1 generally produced a moderate response with an apparent plateau, whereas MCS 2 showed a pronounced concentration-related effect at 4-5 µg/mL. At 5 µg/mL, MCS 2 reduced metabolic activity to approximately 49%, neutral red uptake to 50.04%, the JC-1 aggregate-to-monomer ratio to 46.02%, and colony formation to 31.44% of the control. Conclusions: The suspensions exhibited distinct physicochemical and biological profiles. MCS 2 produced greater effects at the highest concentrations, potentially related to its smaller hydrodynamic size and more uniform particle-size distribution. Further studies should establish tumor selectivity, cellular uptake, and the underlying molecular mechanisms.