MedElevator
Войти в исследования International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2011
Volume slicing of cone-beam computed tomography images for navigation of percutaneous scaphoid fixation.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Smith Erin J, Al-Sanawi Hisham A, Gammon Braden, St John Paul J, Pichora David R, Ellis Randy E
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Percutaneous scaphoid fixation (PSF) is growing in popularity as a treatment option for non-displaced fractures. Success of this procedure demands high-precision screw placement, which can be difficult to achieve with standard 2D imaging. This study aimed to develop and test a system for computer-assisted navigation using volume slicing of 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
METHODS: The navigated technique involved a distinctive workflow in which a 3D CBCT imager was calibrated preoperatively, circumventing the need for intraoperative patient-based registration. Intraoperatively, a 3D CBCT image was acquired for both preoperative planning and direct navigation using volume-rendered slices. An in vitro study was conducted to compare the navigated approach to two conventional fluoroscopic methods for volar PSF. The surgical goal was to insert a guide wire to maximize both length and central placement.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the mean central placement of guide wire, although the variance in central placement was significantly lower using VS navigation (P < 0.01). The lengths of the drill paths were significantly longer for the VS-navigated group compared with one 2D group (P < 0.1). Each navigated trial required only one drilling attempt and resulted in less radiation exposure than conventional C-arm (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Volume-sliced navigation achieved a more repeatable and reliable central pin placement, with fewer drilling attempts than conventional 2D techniques. Volume-sliced navigation had a higher number of drill paths within the optimal zone maximizing both length of the path and depth from the surface.
METHODS: The navigated technique involved a distinctive workflow in which a 3D CBCT imager was calibrated preoperatively, circumventing the need for intraoperative patient-based registration. Intraoperatively, a 3D CBCT image was acquired for both preoperative planning and direct navigation using volume-rendered slices. An in vitro study was conducted to compare the navigated approach to two conventional fluoroscopic methods for volar PSF. The surgical goal was to insert a guide wire to maximize both length and central placement.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the mean central placement of guide wire, although the variance in central placement was significantly lower using VS navigation (P < 0.01). The lengths of the drill paths were significantly longer for the VS-navigated group compared with one 2D group (P < 0.1). Each navigated trial required only one drilling attempt and resulted in less radiation exposure than conventional C-arm (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Volume-sliced navigation achieved a more repeatable and reliable central pin placement, with fewer drilling attempts than conventional 2D techniques. Volume-sliced navigation had a higher number of drill paths within the optimal zone maximizing both length of the path and depth from the surface.