DOI 10.1007/s00276-025-03657-1
The anatomy of the inferior mesenteric artery: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This evidence-based systematic review with meta-analysis aims to synthesize the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) variants including their origin level, branching patterns, and morphometric characteristics.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
The study adhered to the latest guidelines. Four online databases were used for the systematic review, and studies that reported the prevalence of IMA variants were considered eligible for inclusion. A statistical meta-analysis was conducted using R programming software with a random-effects model to calculate the pooled prevalence of the variants.
RESULTS
Twenty-three (23) studies were included in this analysis. The IMA typically originated at the 3rd lumbar vertebra (L3) level, occurring in 70.16% of cases. The most common branching pattern of the IMA was bifurcated, indicating a pooled prevalence of 63.89%. This predominant pattern involved the IMA bifurcating into the left colic artery (LCA) and a common trunk for both the superior rectal artery (SRA) and the sigmoid artery (SA), with a pooled prevalence of 46.09%. The IMA trifurcation and tetrafurcation had pooled prevalences of 27.35% and 11.62%, respectively. The diameter of the IMA had a pooled mean of 41.41 mm, and the distance from the IMA's origin to the LCA had a pooled mean of 40.67 mm.
CONCLUSIONS
This review of existing literature delineates the IMA levels of origin, branching patterns, and morphometric characteristics. A comprehensive understanding of the surgical anatomy of this vessel is imperative during colorectal cancer procedures. Consequently, surgeons operating in this anatomical region must possess an in-depth knowledge of typical and variant anatomical structures.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.