MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/00016481003749313

Медицинская библиотека · Acta oto-laryngologica · 2010

Management of facial nerve schwannoma: A single institution experience.

Bäck Leif, Heikkilä Tero, Passador-Santos Fabricio, Saat Riste, Leivo Ilmo, Mäkitie Antti A

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

CONCLUSION

Difficulties in diagnosis, conservative initial steps in the management algorithm and intraoperative risks for facial nerve (FN) injury are divisive features for this tumour entity.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to investigate the management and outcome of FN schwannomas (FNSs) at a tertiary referral centre and academic institution in a 30-year material.

METHODS

Data on age, sex, symptoms, tumour location, histopathological characteristics, imaging, management and outcome were retrospectively recorded.

RESULTS

Ten cases (six males, 60%), with a median age of 34.5 years (range 19-75 years) were identified. Five of the patients had intact FN function at the time of diagnosis. Five of the tumours were intraparotid and five were located in the temporal bone. Preoperative fine needle aspirations were non-diagnostic in all of the four patients presenting with a parotid mass. Nine patients were managed surgically. One patient is currently under conservative follow-up for a parotid schwannoma (diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging) with intact FN function. No malignant schwannomas were encountered. The clinical outcome and histology will be discussed.

Для цитирования: Bäck Leif, Heikkilä Tero, Passador-Santos Fabricio, Saat Riste, Leivo Ilmo, Mäkitie Antti A. Management of facial nerve schwannoma: A single institution experience.. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2010. DOI: 10.3109/00016481003749313.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.