MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1089/sur.2012.205

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical infections · 2014

Nocardia farcinica brain abscess: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and literature review.

Kumar V Anil, Augustine Deepthi, Panikar Dilip, Nandakumar Aswathy, Dinesh Kavitha R, Karim Shamsul, Philip Rosamma

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Infections caused by Nocardia farcinica are potentially lethal because of the organism's tendency to disseminate and resist antibiotics. Central nervous system involvement has been documented in 30% of infections caused N. farcinica.

METHODS

Case report and review of the literature.

RESULTS

A case of primary brain abscess caused by N. farcinica, identified by 16SrRNA sequencing, is presented, and 39 cases reported previously in the literature are reviewed. Our patient underwent a neuronavigation-guided right frontal craniotomy and was treated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid for 12 mo. He showed marginal improvement in his prior left hemiparesis at the last review 14 months later.

CONCLUSION

Cases of N. farcinica infections are being reported increasingly because of recent changes in taxonomy and diagnostic methodology. This change in epidemiology has implications for therapy because of the organism's pathogenicity and natural resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents, including third-generation cephalosporins. Any delay in starting appropriate antibiotic therapy can have adverse consequences.

Для цитирования: Kumar V Anil, Augustine Deepthi, Panikar Dilip, Nandakumar Aswathy, Dinesh Kavitha R, Karim Shamsul, Philip Rosamma. Nocardia farcinica brain abscess: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and literature review.. Surgical infections. 2014. DOI: 10.1089/sur.2012.205.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.