MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01703

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in psychology · 2016

Unhappiness Intensifies the Avoidance of Frequent Losses While Happiness Overcomes It.

Yechiam Eldad, Telpaz Ariel, Krupenia Stas, Rafaeli Anat

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The implication of spontaneous and induced unhappiness to people's decision style is examined. It is postulated that unhappy individuals have a greater tendency to avoid frequent losses because these can have depleting effects, and unhappy individuals are more sensitive to such effects. This is evaluated in Study 1 by using an annoying customer call manipulation to induce negative affect; and by examining the effect of this manipulation on choices in an experiential decision task (the Iowa Gambling task). In Study 2 we examined the association between self-reported (un)happiness and choices on the same decision task. In Study 1 the induction of negative affect led to avoidance of choice alternatives with frequent losses, compared to those yielding rarer but larger losses. Specifically, this pertained to the advantageous alternatives with frequent vs. non-frequent losses. In Study 2 unhappiness was similarly associated with less exposure to frequent losses; while extreme high happiness was associated with no tendency to avoid frequent losses when these were part of an advantageous alternative. The findings clarify the role of happiness in decision making processes by indicating that unhappiness induces sensitivity to the frequency rather than to the total effect of negative events.

Для цитирования: Yechiam Eldad, Telpaz Ariel, Krupenia Stas, Rafaeli Anat. Unhappiness Intensifies the Avoidance of Frequent Losses While Happiness Overcomes It.. Frontiers in psychology. 2016. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01703.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.