MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1602046

Медицинская библиотека · The New England journal of medicine · 2016

Safety and Efficacy of a Dapivirine Vaginal Ring for HIV Prevention in Women.

Nel Annalene, van Niekerk Neliëtte, Kapiga Saidi, Bekker Linda-Gail, Gama Cynthia, Gill Katherine, Kamali Anatoli, Kotze Philip, Louw Cheryl, Mabude Zonke, Miti Nokuthula, Kusemererwa Sylvia, Tempelman Hugo, Carstens Hannelie, Devlin Brid, Isaacs Michelle, Malherbe Mariëtte, Mans Winel, Nuttall Jeremy, Russell Marisa, Ntshele Smangaliso, Smit Marlie, Solai Leonard, Spence Patrick, Steytler John, Windle Kathleen, Borremans Maarten, Resseler Sophie, Van Roey Jens, Parys Wim, Vangeneugden Tony, Van Baelen Ben, Rosenberg Zeda, Ring Study Team

Клиническое исследование III фазыСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The incidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection remains high among women in sub-Saharan Africa. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of extended use of a vaginal ring containing dapivirine for the prevention of HIV infection in 1959 healthy, sexually active women, 18 to 45 years of age, from seven communities in South Africa and Uganda.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned participants in a 2:1 ratio to receive vaginal rings containing either 25 mg of dapivirine or placebo. Participants inserted the rings themselves every 4 weeks for up to 24 months. The primary efficacy end point was the rate of HIV type 1 (HIV-1) seroconversion.

RESULTS

A total of 77 participants in the dapivirine group underwent HIV-1 seroconversion during 1888 person-years of follow-up (4.1 seroconversions per 100 person-years), as compared with 56 in the placebo group who underwent HIV-1 seroconversion during 917 person-years of follow-up (6.1 seroconversions per 100 person-years). The incidence of HIV-1 infection was 31% lower in the dapivirine group than in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.99; P=0.04). There was no significant difference in efficacy of the dapivirine ring among women older than 21 years of age (hazard ratio for infection, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.97) and those 21 years of age or younger (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.60; P=0.43 for treatment-by-age interaction). Among participants with HIV-1 infection, nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor resistance mutations were detected in 14 of 77 participants in the dapivirine group (18.2%) and in 9 of 56 (16.1%) in the placebo group. Serious adverse events occurred more often in the dapivirine group (in 38 participants [2.9%]) than in the placebo group (in 6 [0.9%]). However, no clear pattern was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Among women in sub-Saharan Africa, the dapivirine ring was not associated with any safety concerns and was associated with a rate of acquisition of HIV-1 infection that was lower than the rate with placebo. (Funded by the International Partnership for Microbicides; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01539226 .).

Для цитирования: Nel Annalene, van Niekerk Neliëtte, Kapiga Saidi, Bekker Linda-Gail, Gama Cynthia, Gill Katherine, Kamali Anatoli, Kotze Philip, Louw Cheryl, Mabude Zonke, Miti Nokuthula, Kusemererwa Sylvia, Tempelman Hugo, Carstens Hannelie, Devlin Brid, Isaacs Michelle, Malherbe Mariëtte, Mans Winel, Nuttall Jeremy, Russell Marisa, Ntshele Smangaliso, Smit Marlie, Solai Leonard, Spence Patrick, Steytler John, Windle Kathleen, Borremans Maarten, Resseler Sophie, Van Roey Jens, Parys Wim, Vangeneugden Tony, Van Baelen Ben, Rosenberg Zeda, Ring Study Team. Safety and Efficacy of a Dapivirine Vaginal Ring for HIV Prevention in Women.. The New England journal of medicine. 2016. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1602046.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.