Chinese medical journal · 2025
Fertility-preserving treatment of endometrial cancer and endometrial atypical hyperplasia for patients with metabolic abnormalities: Challenge or opportunity?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bo Linlin, Wang Yiqin, Feng Yifan, Zhou Jingyi, Liu Yuanyuan, He Yijiao, Zhai Yuanhe, Fan Yuan, Zhang Xiaobo, Zhou Rong, Shen Danhua, Tian Li, Wang Jianliu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: There is a growing demand for fertility-sparing treatment among young patients with early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) and endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a regimen that combines anti-estrogen therapy with treatments targeting glucose, lipid, and calcium metabolism in EC and EAH patients.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with EC and EAH who were treated at Peking University People's Hospital between January 2018 and November 2023. The study investigated the clinical profiles of the patients and assessed the efficacy of different treatment strategies.
RESULTS: A total of 285 patients were enrolled in the study, with 149 receiving anti-estrogen monotherapy and 136 receiving a combination therapy (including metformin, statins, calcium channel blockers [CCBs]). The combination therapy group showed a significantly higher proportion of patients with elevated body mass index, insulin resistance, diabetes, and hypertension compared to anti-estrogen group ( P <0.05), and both groups had similar complete response (CR) time and CR rate. Pathological type of EAH and metformin regimen were protective factors for shorter complete response time ( P <0.05). Subsequent stratified analysis revealed that combination therapy with metformin significantly benefited patients with insulin resistance (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.888, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.313-2.713) and diabetes mellitus (HR = 2.749, 95% CI: 1.046-7.299).
CONCLUSIONS: Fertility-sparing treatments for patients with metabolic risk factors may have poor efficacy. However, the integration of anti-estrogen therapy with the metabolic-targeting interventions, like metformin, appears to improve the outcomes of fertility-preserving strategies in this patient population.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with EC and EAH who were treated at Peking University People's Hospital between January 2018 and November 2023. The study investigated the clinical profiles of the patients and assessed the efficacy of different treatment strategies.
RESULTS: A total of 285 patients were enrolled in the study, with 149 receiving anti-estrogen monotherapy and 136 receiving a combination therapy (including metformin, statins, calcium channel blockers [CCBs]). The combination therapy group showed a significantly higher proportion of patients with elevated body mass index, insulin resistance, diabetes, and hypertension compared to anti-estrogen group ( P <0.05), and both groups had similar complete response (CR) time and CR rate. Pathological type of EAH and metformin regimen were protective factors for shorter complete response time ( P <0.05). Subsequent stratified analysis revealed that combination therapy with metformin significantly benefited patients with insulin resistance (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.888, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.313-2.713) and diabetes mellitus (HR = 2.749, 95% CI: 1.046-7.299).
CONCLUSIONS: Fertility-sparing treatments for patients with metabolic risk factors may have poor efficacy. However, the integration of anti-estrogen therapy with the metabolic-targeting interventions, like metformin, appears to improve the outcomes of fertility-preserving strategies in this patient population.