Journal of anesthesia · 2026
Conventional ultrafiltration increases viscoelastic clot firmness during cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective observational study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Oh Chung-Sik, Kim Kyungmi, Lee Dong-Kyu, Görlinger Klaus, Kim Kyeng-Whan, Park Sun-Young, Kwon Won-Kyung, Kim Tae-Yop, Choi In-Cheol
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Ultrafiltration (UF) reduces dilution of all blood components during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), but its impact on coagulation performance remains unclear. We examined whether conventional UF mitigates the CPB-induced decline in extrinsic-pathway clot firmness (MCF-EXTEM; reference range 50-72 mm) measured by rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), a marker of coagulopathic bleeding risk in cardiac surgery.
METHODS: In a prospective observational study, we recruited adult cardiac surgery patients who received UF near the end of CPB (n=39) and included patients with Pre-UF MCF EXTEM ≤50 mm (n=27). Pre-UF versus Post-UF ROTEM parameters, including MCF-EXTEM, fibrin- and platelet-based clot firmness (MCF-FIBTEM and MCF-PLTEM, respectively), were compared (Wilcoxon signed-rank tests). Changes in MCF-EXTEM and their correlation with the volume of filtered free water (UF volume) were analyzed.
RESULTS: UF volume ranging 500-1200 mL increased hematocrit from 21.0% to 25.0% by 4.0% (median, P < 0.001, effect size r = 0.811). As the primary outcome, UF increased MCF-EXTEM from 45.0 mm to 49.0 mm by 4.0 mm (median, 95% confidence interval 2.5‒6.0 mm, P = 0.001, r = 0.755). UF also increased MCF-FIBTEM by 2.0 mm (median, P < 0.001, r = 0.824), but it did not affect MCF-PLTEM (P = 0.060). A moderate positive correlation between UF volume and MCF-EXTEM change was observed (Spearman's ρ = 0.41, P = 0.033).
CONCLUSIONS: Conventional UF during CPB is associated with an attenuation of the CPB‑induced decline in MCF‑EXTEM, and the pattern of changes in FIBTEM and PLTEM is consistent with predominantly fibrin‑related contributions rather than platelet‑related contribution, with an apparent dependence on UF volume.
METHODS: In a prospective observational study, we recruited adult cardiac surgery patients who received UF near the end of CPB (n=39) and included patients with Pre-UF MCF EXTEM ≤50 mm (n=27). Pre-UF versus Post-UF ROTEM parameters, including MCF-EXTEM, fibrin- and platelet-based clot firmness (MCF-FIBTEM and MCF-PLTEM, respectively), were compared (Wilcoxon signed-rank tests). Changes in MCF-EXTEM and their correlation with the volume of filtered free water (UF volume) were analyzed.
RESULTS: UF volume ranging 500-1200 mL increased hematocrit from 21.0% to 25.0% by 4.0% (median, P < 0.001, effect size r = 0.811). As the primary outcome, UF increased MCF-EXTEM from 45.0 mm to 49.0 mm by 4.0 mm (median, 95% confidence interval 2.5‒6.0 mm, P = 0.001, r = 0.755). UF also increased MCF-FIBTEM by 2.0 mm (median, P < 0.001, r = 0.824), but it did not affect MCF-PLTEM (P = 0.060). A moderate positive correlation between UF volume and MCF-EXTEM change was observed (Spearman's ρ = 0.41, P = 0.033).
CONCLUSIONS: Conventional UF during CPB is associated with an attenuation of the CPB‑induced decline in MCF‑EXTEM, and the pattern of changes in FIBTEM and PLTEM is consistent with predominantly fibrin‑related contributions rather than platelet‑related contribution, with an apparent dependence on UF volume.