DOI 10.1097/psy.0000000000000108
Ecological momentary assessment of eating episodes in obese adults.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
The context of eating episodes in obesity is poorly understood. This study examined emotional, physiological, and environmental correlates of pathological and nonpathological eating episodes in a heterogeneous sample of obese adults.
METHODS
Community-based participants (n = 50; 84% female [n = 42]; mean [standard deviation] body mass index = 40.3 [8.5]; mean [standard deviation] age = 43.0 [11.9]) recorded all eating episodes and their emotional, physiological, and environmental correlates via ecological momentary assessment for 2 weeks. Generalized estimating equations examined relations between these variables and eating episodes characterized by both self-identified loss of control (LOC) while eating and overeating (binge eating; BE), LOC only, overeating only (OE), and neither LOC nor OE (nonpathological eating).
RESULTS
Episodes involving loss of control (BE and LOC) were associated with heightened preepisode and postepisode negative effects (Wald χ range, 15.67-24.39; p values < .001), whereas those involving overeating (BE and OE) were associated with the lowest preepisode and postepisode hunger (Wald χ range, 18.14-39.75; p values <.001). LOC episodes were followed by heightened postepisode cravings (Wald χ = 25.87; p < .001) and were most likely to occur when participants were alone (Wald χ = 13.20; p = .004).
CONCLUSION
BE and LOC eating were more consistently associated with emotional and physiological cues than OE and nonpathological eating, whereas most environmental variables did not differ among eating episode types. Results support distinctions among the different constructs characterizing aberrant eating and may be used to inform interventions for obesity and related eating pathology.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.