DOI 10.1080/17425255.2026.2686707
Gastrointestinal bleeding risk among antithrombotics users: a propensity score matched study of drug classes.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Antithrombotic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) impact patient safety. This study used causal inference framework to examine the association between interacting drugs, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), antiplatelets, warfarin and incident gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding risk.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND
METHODS
Data from Merative MarketScan commercial and Medicare claims (2013-2021), enriched with Micromedex data were used. Adults (≥18 years) with antithrombotics claims were included. Incident GI bleeding was primary outcome. Adaptive post-double selection using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was implemented for variable selection. Following propensity score matching, final estimates were obtained from weighted logistic models.
RESULTS
The final matched cohorts included 368,934 patients for DOACs vs Antiplatelets; 261,184 for DOACs vs warfarin and 192,955 for antiplatelets vs warfarin. Baseline characteristics were well balanced (standardized mean difference (SMD) <0.05). Compared to antiplatelets, DOACs were associated with a significant reduction in incident GI bleeding risk (odds ratio (OR): 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91-0.98; PFDR = 0.006). None of the interacting drugs reached statistical significance, bleeding risk was driven by age (>70 years) and comorbidities.
CONCLUSIONS
Within a causal inference framework, DOACs exposure was associated with less risk of GI bleeding compared to antiplatelets. However, class-level grouping may mask individual drug-specific metabolic risks.
IRB: The protocol (STUDY00016941) was reviewed and received exemption determination by the University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.