MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmj.c6267

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2010

Explaining variation in referral from primary to secondary care: cohort study.

McBride Dulcie, Hardoon Sarah, Walters Kate, Gilmour Stuart, Raine Rosalind

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To determine the extent to which referral for defined symptoms from primary care varies by age, sex, and social deprivation and whether any sociodemographic variations in referral differ according to the presence of national referral guidance and the potential of the symptoms to be life threatening.

DESIGN

Cohort study using individual patient data from the health improvement network database in primary care.

SETTING

United Kingdom.

PARTICIPANTS

5492 patients with postmenopausal bleeding, 23 121 with hip pain, and 101 212 with dyspepsia from 326 general practices, 2001-7.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Multivariable associations between odds of immediate referral for postmenopausal bleeding and age and social deprivation; hazard rates of referral for hip pain or dyspepsia and age, sex, and social deprivation. Analyses for dyspepsia were stratified for people aged less than and more than 55 years because referral guidance differs by age.

RESULTS

61.4% (3374/5492) of patients with postmenopausal bleeding, 17.4% (4019/23 121) with hip pain, and 13.8% (13 944/101 212) with dyspepsia were referred. The likelihood of referral for postmenopausal bleeding declined with increasing age: the adjusted odds ratio for patients aged 85 or more compared with those aged 55-64 was 0.39 (95% confidence interval 0.31 to 0.49). Patients aged 85 or more with hip pain were also less likely to be referred than those aged 55-64 (0.68, 0.57 to 0.81). Women were less likely than men to be referred for hip pain (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 0.96). More deprived patients with hip pain or dyspepsia (if aged <55) were less likely to be referred. Adjusted hazard ratios for those in the most deprived Townsend fifth compared with the least deprived were 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.82) and 0.76 (0.68 to 0.85), respectively. No socioeconomic gradient was evident in referral for postmenopausal bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Inequalities in referral associated with socioeconomic circumstances were more likely to occur in the absence of both explicit guidance and potentially life threatening conditions, whereas inequalities with age were evident for all conditions.

Для цитирования: McBride Dulcie, Hardoon Sarah, Walters Kate, Gilmour Stuart, Raine Rosalind. Explaining variation in referral from primary to secondary care: cohort study.. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2010. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c6267.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.