MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/0002-9149(81)90534-8

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of cardiology · 1981

The natural history of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Fuster V, Gersh B J, Giuliani E R, Tajik A J, Brandenburg R O, Frye R L

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Between 1960 and 1973, a total of 104 patients at the Mayo Clinic had a diagnosis of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy on the basis of clinical and angiographic criteria; these patients were followed up for 6 to 20 years. Twenty-one percent of the patients had a history of excessive consumption of alcohol, 20 percent had had a severe influenza-like syndrome within 60 days before the appearance of cardiac manifestations and 8 percent had had rheumatic fever without involvement of cardiac valves several years before; thus, possible etiologic risk factors of infectious-immunologic type may be important. Eighty patients (77 percent) had an accelerated course to death, with two thirds of the deaths occurring within the first 2 years. Twenty-four patients (23 percent) survived, and 18 of them had clinical improvement and a normal or reduced heart size. Univariate analysis at the time of diagnosis revealed three factors that were highly predictive (p less than 0.01) of the clinical course: age, cardiothoracic ratio on chest roentgenography and cardiac index. Systemic emboli occurred in 18 percent of the patients who did not receive anticoagulant therapy and in none of those who did; thus, anticoagulant agents should probably be prescribed unless their use is contraindicated.

Для цитирования: Fuster V, Gersh B J, Giuliani E R, Tajik A J, Brandenburg R O, Frye R L. The natural history of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.. The American journal of cardiology. 1981. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(81)90534-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.