Brain & spine · 2024
Embracing uncertainty in cerebrospinal fluid dynamics: A Bayesian approach to analysing infusion studies.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chabros Jeremi, Placek Michal M, Chu Ka Hing, Beqiri Erta, Hutchinson Peter J, Czosnyka Zofia, Czosnyka Marek, Joannides Alexis, Smielewski Peter
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) infusion test analysis allows recognizing and appropriately evaluating CSF dynamics in the context of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH), which is crucial for effective diagnosis and treatment. However, existing methodology possesses drawbacks that may compromise the precision and interpretation of CSF dynamics parameters.
RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aims to circumvent these constraints by introducing an innovative analysis method grounded in Bayesian inference.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted on 858 patients who underwent a computerized CSF infusion test between 2004 and 2020. We developed a Bayesian framework-based method for parameter estimation and compared the results to the current, gradient descent-based approach. We evaluated the accuracy and reliability of both methods by analysing erroneous prediction rates and curve fitting errors.
RESULTS: The Bayesian method surpasses the gradient descent approach, reflected in reduced inaccurate prediction rates and an improved goodness of model fit. On whole cohort level both techniques produced comparable results. However, the Bayesian method holds an added advantage by providing uncertainty intervals for each parameter. Sensitivity analysis revealed significance of the CSF production rate parameter and its interplay with other variables. The resistance to CSF outflow demonstrated excellent robustness.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The proposed Bayesian approach offers a promising solution for improving robustness of CSF dynamics assessment in NPH, based on CSF infusion tests. Additional provision of the uncertainty measure for each diagnostic metric may perhaps help to explain occasional poor diagnostic performance of the test, offering a robust framework for improved understanding and management of NPH.
RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aims to circumvent these constraints by introducing an innovative analysis method grounded in Bayesian inference.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted on 858 patients who underwent a computerized CSF infusion test between 2004 and 2020. We developed a Bayesian framework-based method for parameter estimation and compared the results to the current, gradient descent-based approach. We evaluated the accuracy and reliability of both methods by analysing erroneous prediction rates and curve fitting errors.
RESULTS: The Bayesian method surpasses the gradient descent approach, reflected in reduced inaccurate prediction rates and an improved goodness of model fit. On whole cohort level both techniques produced comparable results. However, the Bayesian method holds an added advantage by providing uncertainty intervals for each parameter. Sensitivity analysis revealed significance of the CSF production rate parameter and its interplay with other variables. The resistance to CSF outflow demonstrated excellent robustness.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The proposed Bayesian approach offers a promising solution for improving robustness of CSF dynamics assessment in NPH, based on CSF infusion tests. Additional provision of the uncertainty measure for each diagnostic metric may perhaps help to explain occasional poor diagnostic performance of the test, offering a robust framework for improved understanding and management of NPH.