DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2024.1491791
Exploring the role of epileptic focus lateralization on facial emotion recognition in the spectrum of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Evidence increasingly shows that facial emotion recognition (FER) is impaired in refractory mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (rMTLE), especially in patients with a right focus. This study explores FER in both mild (mMTLE) and refractory forms, examining the influence of epileptic focus lateralization on FER.
METHODS
50 MTLE patients, categorized by epilepsy severity and focus lateralization, were compared with healthy controls. FER was assessed using the Ekman Faces Test (EFT), which evaluates recognition of six basic emotions, alongside a battery of cognitive and mood tests.
RESULTS
mMTLE patients showed selective deficits in recognizing fear and anger, while rMTLE patients displayed broader deficits, affecting all emotions except surprise. Patients with a right focus underperformed across all negative emotions, whereas those with a left focus showed deficits mainly in fear and anger. Analysis indicated that early epilepsy onset was associated with poorer FER in right-focused patients; febrile seizures and mesial temporal sclerosis significantly impacted FER in left-focused patients.
CONCLUSION
MTLE affects circuits of FER even in mild subjects, although to a lesser extent than in refractory ones. Earlier onset of MTLE could disrupt the development of FER, possibly interfering during a critical phase of maturation of its circuits, when the focus is right. Conversely, left MTLE may cause less damage to FER circuits, requiring additional factors such as a history of febrile seizures and/or mesial temporal sclerosis for significant impact. Clinically, refractory and right-sided MTLE might be viewed as risk factors of FER deficits.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.