MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11604-010-0520-3

Медицинская библиотека · Japanese journal of radiology · 2011

Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography for patients with suspected scaphoid fractures and negative radiographic examinations.

Ilica Ahmet Turan, Ozyurek Selahattin, Kose Ozkan, Durusu Murat

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in detecting occult scaphoid fractures.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A total of 54 patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture and negative initial conventional radiographs were evaluated with 64-row MDCT wrist examinations within 1 week of the trauma. The gold standard used was the diagnosis on MRI done within 1 week after MDCT. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of MDCT were calculated.

RESULTS

MRI showed a total of 22 fractures in 20 of 55 (36%) wrists. Fractures included 14 scaphoid and 8 other carpal bones. MDCT showed a total of 19 fractures in 17 of 55 (30%) wrists. Two isolated scaphoid fractures and one trapezium fracture were missed on MDCT. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of MDCT were 86%, 100%, 100%, and 91%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MDCT offers highly accurate results, especially concerning cortical involvement, and is a useful alternative in facilities lacking MRI.

Для цитирования: Ilica Ahmet Turan, Ozyurek Selahattin, Kose Ozkan, Durusu Murat. Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography for patients with suspected scaphoid fractures and negative radiographic examinations.. Japanese journal of radiology. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-010-0520-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.