Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2015
Comparative safety evaluation of silica-based particles.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kettiger Helene, Sen Karaman Didem, Schiesser Laura, Rosenholm Jessica M, Huwyler Jörg
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Silica nanoparticles (SNPs) are increasingly used as drug delivery systems (DDS) and for biomedical imaging. Therapeutic and diagnostic agents can be incorporated into the silica matrix to improve the stability and dissolution of drug substances in biological systems. However, the safety of SNPs as drug carriers remains controversial. To date, no validated and accepted nano-specific tests exist to predict the potentially harmful impact of these materials on the human body.
METHODS: We synthesized by a systematic approach 12 different types of SNPs with varying size, surface topology (porous vs non-porous), and surface modifications. We characterized these particles in terms of dry state and hydrodynamic diameter, specific surface area, and net surface charge (ζ-potential). For cellular studies, we exposed non-phagocytic (HepG2) cells, phagocytic (THP-1) cells, and erythrocytes to SNPs. Cellular uptake and stability of fluorescently labeled SNPs were analyzed by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry.
RESULTS: SNPs with a porous surface and negative net surface charge had the strongest impact on cell viability. This is in contrast to non-porous SNPs. None of the studied particles induced oxidative stress in either cell lines. Particles with a negative surface charge induced hemolysis in a concentration-dependent manner.
CONCLUSIONS: Physico-chemical properties promoting cytotoxicity and hemolysis were investigated. Our study revealed potential hazards of spherical amorphous SNPs.
METHODS: We synthesized by a systematic approach 12 different types of SNPs with varying size, surface topology (porous vs non-porous), and surface modifications. We characterized these particles in terms of dry state and hydrodynamic diameter, specific surface area, and net surface charge (ζ-potential). For cellular studies, we exposed non-phagocytic (HepG2) cells, phagocytic (THP-1) cells, and erythrocytes to SNPs. Cellular uptake and stability of fluorescently labeled SNPs were analyzed by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry.
RESULTS: SNPs with a porous surface and negative net surface charge had the strongest impact on cell viability. This is in contrast to non-porous SNPs. None of the studied particles induced oxidative stress in either cell lines. Particles with a negative surface charge induced hemolysis in a concentration-dependent manner.
CONCLUSIONS: Physico-chemical properties promoting cytotoxicity and hemolysis were investigated. Our study revealed potential hazards of spherical amorphous SNPs.