Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
Constipation and hemolytic uremic syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Crawford Brendan, Strebeck Paige, Saccente Suzanne
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) classically presents with diarrhea. Absence of diarrheal prodrome increases suspicion for atypical HUS (aHUS). Inability to obtain a fecal specimen for culture or culture-independent testing limits the ability to differentiate STEC-HUS and aHUS.
CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT: Our patient presented with abdominal pain and constipation, and evaluation of pallor led to a diagnosis of HUS. There was a complete absence of diarrhea during the disease course. Lack of fecal specimen for several days delayed testing for STEC. Treatment for atypical HUS was initiated with complement-blockade therapy. PCR-testing for Shiga toxin from fecal specimen later returned positive. Alternative complement-pathway testing did not identify a causative genetic variant or anti-Factor H antibody. A diagnosis of STEC-HUS was assigned, and complement-blockade therapy was stopped.
CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of aHUS remains a diagnosis of exclusion, whereby other causes of HUS are eliminated with reasonable certainty. Exclusion of STEC is necessary and relies on testing availability and recognition of testing limitations. Diarrhea-negative STEC-HUS remains a minority of cases, and future research is needed to explore the clinical characteristics of these patients.
CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT: Our patient presented with abdominal pain and constipation, and evaluation of pallor led to a diagnosis of HUS. There was a complete absence of diarrhea during the disease course. Lack of fecal specimen for several days delayed testing for STEC. Treatment for atypical HUS was initiated with complement-blockade therapy. PCR-testing for Shiga toxin from fecal specimen later returned positive. Alternative complement-pathway testing did not identify a causative genetic variant or anti-Factor H antibody. A diagnosis of STEC-HUS was assigned, and complement-blockade therapy was stopped.
CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of aHUS remains a diagnosis of exclusion, whereby other causes of HUS are eliminated with reasonable certainty. Exclusion of STEC is necessary and relies on testing availability and recognition of testing limitations. Diarrhea-negative STEC-HUS remains a minority of cases, and future research is needed to explore the clinical characteristics of these patients.