Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017
Detection radius of EMG for fasciculations: Empiric study combining ultrasonography and electromyography.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Regensburger Martin, Tenner Felix, Möbius Cornelia, Schramm Axel
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to investigate the detection radius and sensitivity of EMG for fasciculations.
METHODS: Muscle ultrasonography was performed simultaneously to EMG recordings in patients with fasciculations in the context of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ultrasonography and EMG parameters were analyzed for selected fasciculations.
RESULTS: A total of 381 fasciculations were detected by ultrasonography in 18 muscles of 10 patients. Out of these, 125 (33%) were EMG-negative. In contrast, none of the fasciculations detected by EMG were ultrasonography-negative. EMG detection probability decreased significantly with increasing distance from the center of the fasciculation. EMG detection rate was 98% when the EMG needle was located within the fasciculation and 50% at 7.75 mm distance from the fasciculation center. In addition, EMG detection depended significantly on cross-sectional area of the fasciculation and presence of neurogenic changes.
CONCLUSIONS: For detecting the same fasciculations, EMG is less sensitive than ultrasonography. EMG detection probability decreases sharply at a distance comparable to motor unit size.
SIGNIFICANCE: These results extend previous knowledge about superior sensitivity of ultrasonography for fasciculations. Moreover, our novel bimodal detection method provides first in vivo data about the EMG detection radius for fasciculations in a clinical setting.
METHODS: Muscle ultrasonography was performed simultaneously to EMG recordings in patients with fasciculations in the context of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ultrasonography and EMG parameters were analyzed for selected fasciculations.
RESULTS: A total of 381 fasciculations were detected by ultrasonography in 18 muscles of 10 patients. Out of these, 125 (33%) were EMG-negative. In contrast, none of the fasciculations detected by EMG were ultrasonography-negative. EMG detection probability decreased significantly with increasing distance from the center of the fasciculation. EMG detection rate was 98% when the EMG needle was located within the fasciculation and 50% at 7.75 mm distance from the fasciculation center. In addition, EMG detection depended significantly on cross-sectional area of the fasciculation and presence of neurogenic changes.
CONCLUSIONS: For detecting the same fasciculations, EMG is less sensitive than ultrasonography. EMG detection probability decreases sharply at a distance comparable to motor unit size.
SIGNIFICANCE: These results extend previous knowledge about superior sensitivity of ultrasonography for fasciculations. Moreover, our novel bimodal detection method provides first in vivo data about the EMG detection radius for fasciculations in a clinical setting.