MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00540-026-03722-y

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of anesthesia · 2026

The effect of remimazolam versus propofol on respiratory depression for non-intubated general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

Chen Yutao, Li Siru, Wang Di, Zhang Wenhui, Jiang Chenxin, Su Naying, Bi Congjie

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the respiratory safety profiles of remimazolam versus propofol during non-intubated general anesthesia.

METHODS

This single-center, randomized controlled trial investigated 200 female patients undergoing Open Excision of Benign Breast Nodule (OEBN) under non-intubated general anesthesia. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either remimazolam or propofol for anesthesia induction and maintenance, combined with remifentanil. We employed the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scale for continuous sedation monitoring. The primary endpoint was the incidence of respiratory depression. Secondary outcomes encompassed: postoperative recovery quality, sedation success rate, frequency of respiratory depression episodes, requirement for airway interventions, and occurrence of adverse events (including hemodynamic instability and procedure-related complications).

RESULTS

Of 200 randomized participants, 173 completed all study procedures and were included in the final analysis (Group R: n = 87; Group P: n = 86). The remimazolam group exhibited superior respiratory safety profiles compared to the propofol group, with a lower incidence of respiratory depression (89.7% vs 97.7%, p = 0.031) and a significantly reduced requirement for airway interventions (all p < 0.05). Furthermore, remimazolam predominantly induces mild respiratory depression (73.6%), whereas propofol is more frequently associated with severe respiratory suppression (44.2%). Regarding adverse events, Group R demonstrated markedly lower rates of injection pain (0% vs 39.5%, p < 0.001), hypotension (29.9% vs 46.5%, p = 0.024), and bradycardia (18.4% vs 44.2%, p < 0.001). Patients receiving remimazolam (Group R) demonstrated significantly superior hemodynamic stability compared to the propofol group.

CONCLUSION

Although both remimazolam and propofol demonstrated a high incidence of respiratory depression, remimazolam was associated with milder respiratory suppression and a reduced need for airway interventions during OEBN with non-intubated general anesthesia. Additionally, it offers better hemodynamic stability and fewer adverse events, making it a safer alternative for such procedures.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2400089826.

Для цитирования: Chen Yutao, Li Siru, Wang Di, Zhang Wenhui, Jiang Chenxin, Su Naying, Bi Congjie. The effect of remimazolam versus propofol on respiratory depression for non-intubated general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.. Journal of anesthesia. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-026-03722-y.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.