Archives of cardiovascular diseases · 2018
Transoesophageal echocardiography current practice in France: A multicentre study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Coisne Augustin, Dreyfus Julien, Bohbot Yohann, Pelletier Vincent, Collette Edouard, Cescau Arthur, Cariou Eve, Alexandrino Cécile, Coulibaly Sophie, Seemann Aurélien, Karsenty Clément, Theron Alexis, Caspar Thibault, Soulat-Dufour Laurie, Ternacle Julien
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Few data are available on the application of transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) recommendations in daily practice.
AIMS: To evaluate TOE practice based on echocardiography societies' guidelines, and to determine complication rates and factors associated with patient feelings.
METHODS: Between April and June 2017, we prospectively included all consecutive patients referred to 14 French hospitals for a transoesophageal echocardiogram (TOE). A survey was taken just after the examination, which included questions about pre-procedural anxiety, and any pain, unpleasant feeling or breathing difficulties experienced during the examination.
RESULTS: Overall, 1718 TOEs were performed, mainly for stroke evaluation. A standardized operating procedure checklist was completed in half of the patients before the examination. TOE was unpleasant for 62.4% of patients, but was stopped for agitation or intolerance in 3.5 and 1.4% of cases, respectively. We observed one severe complication (pulmonary oedema). The mean TOE duration was short (9.2±4.6minutes), but was longer with residents than with more experienced physicians (11±4.7 vs. 8.8±4.7minutes for junior physicians [P=0.0027]; vs. 8.9±4.8minutes for senior physicians [P=0.0013]; and vs. 7.5±4.1minutes for associate professors/professors [P<0.0001]). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score after TOE was good (8.3±1.7 out of 10), and was better in patients with general anaesthesia (GA) than in those without GA (9.3±0.9 vs. 8.1±1.7; P<0.0001). In patients without GA, the VAS score was similar with and without local anaesthesia (8.1±1.7 vs. 8.2±1.6; P=0.19). After multivariable adjustment, absence of anxiety before TOE and greater operator experience were consistently associated with a higher VAS score.
CONCLUSIONS: TOE is safe, with a low rate of complications and few stops for intolerance. A shorter TOE duration and better patient feelings were observed for experienced operators, highlighting the importance of the learning curve, and paving the way for teaching on a TOE simulator.
AIMS: To evaluate TOE practice based on echocardiography societies' guidelines, and to determine complication rates and factors associated with patient feelings.
METHODS: Between April and June 2017, we prospectively included all consecutive patients referred to 14 French hospitals for a transoesophageal echocardiogram (TOE). A survey was taken just after the examination, which included questions about pre-procedural anxiety, and any pain, unpleasant feeling or breathing difficulties experienced during the examination.
RESULTS: Overall, 1718 TOEs were performed, mainly for stroke evaluation. A standardized operating procedure checklist was completed in half of the patients before the examination. TOE was unpleasant for 62.4% of patients, but was stopped for agitation or intolerance in 3.5 and 1.4% of cases, respectively. We observed one severe complication (pulmonary oedema). The mean TOE duration was short (9.2±4.6minutes), but was longer with residents than with more experienced physicians (11±4.7 vs. 8.8±4.7minutes for junior physicians [P=0.0027]; vs. 8.9±4.8minutes for senior physicians [P=0.0013]; and vs. 7.5±4.1minutes for associate professors/professors [P<0.0001]). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score after TOE was good (8.3±1.7 out of 10), and was better in patients with general anaesthesia (GA) than in those without GA (9.3±0.9 vs. 8.1±1.7; P<0.0001). In patients without GA, the VAS score was similar with and without local anaesthesia (8.1±1.7 vs. 8.2±1.6; P=0.19). After multivariable adjustment, absence of anxiety before TOE and greater operator experience were consistently associated with a higher VAS score.
CONCLUSIONS: TOE is safe, with a low rate of complications and few stops for intolerance. A shorter TOE duration and better patient feelings were observed for experienced operators, highlighting the importance of the learning curve, and paving the way for teaching on a TOE simulator.