MedElevator
Войти в исследования Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2026
Subphenogroups of acute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: comprehensive proteomics and pathway analysis.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sotomi Yohei, Matsuoka Yuki, Ebert Christina, Wang Zhaoqing, Ohtani Tomohito, Kammerhoff Karl, Liu Laura, Schafer Peter, Chang Ching-Pin, Gordon David, Hikoso Shungo, Chirinos Julio A, Zhao Lei, Sakata Yasushi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) results in significant challenges for treatment development. Identifying and characterising distinct HFpEF phenogroups may aid in tailoring therapeutic strategies for these patients. The objective of this study was to assess proteomic patterns of HFpEF phenogroups identified through a machine-learning-based clustering model, with the aim of uncovering specific biological pathways associated with each phenogroup.
METHODS: This study represents a post-hoc analysis of the ongoing Prospective mUlticenteR obServational stUdy of patIenTs with Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (PURSUIT-HFpEF) study, which is a multicentre prospective observational study of hospitalised patients with acute decompensated HFpEF. Of the overall cohort (N=1238), this study analysed 198 patients with HFpEF with available proteomics data. These patients were classified into four phenogroups using the machine-learning-based clustering model. The SomaScan assay V.4.1 was used to measure levels of >7000 plasma proteins, and subsequent pathway analysis was conducted to determine the biological differences among the phenogroups.
RESULTS: We identified four distinct phenogroups: Phenogroup 1 ('rhythm trouble'), Phenogroup 2 ('ventricular-arterial uncoupling'), Phenogroup 3 ('low output and systemic congestion') and Phenogroup 4 ('systemic failure'). The proteomics revealed distinct protein expression profiles among the phenogroups, with ribonuclease 4, tax1-binding protein 1, regenerating islet-derived protein 3-gamma and alpha-1-antichymotrypsin being the most significant markers to specific identified phenogroups. Pathway analysis suggested differences in immune response, autonomic activation, cellular homeostasis and tissue repair mechanisms across the phenogroups.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a comprehensive plasma proteomics approach, our study identified distinct proteomic profiles of HFpEF phenogroups, which in turn suggest specific underlying biological processes. These profiles suggest the involvement of inflammatory activation, tissue injury and regenerative responses, immune modulation and systemic stress signalling as key components of HFpEF pathophysiology.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN-CTR ID: UMIN000021831.
METHODS: This study represents a post-hoc analysis of the ongoing Prospective mUlticenteR obServational stUdy of patIenTs with Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (PURSUIT-HFpEF) study, which is a multicentre prospective observational study of hospitalised patients with acute decompensated HFpEF. Of the overall cohort (N=1238), this study analysed 198 patients with HFpEF with available proteomics data. These patients were classified into four phenogroups using the machine-learning-based clustering model. The SomaScan assay V.4.1 was used to measure levels of >7000 plasma proteins, and subsequent pathway analysis was conducted to determine the biological differences among the phenogroups.
RESULTS: We identified four distinct phenogroups: Phenogroup 1 ('rhythm trouble'), Phenogroup 2 ('ventricular-arterial uncoupling'), Phenogroup 3 ('low output and systemic congestion') and Phenogroup 4 ('systemic failure'). The proteomics revealed distinct protein expression profiles among the phenogroups, with ribonuclease 4, tax1-binding protein 1, regenerating islet-derived protein 3-gamma and alpha-1-antichymotrypsin being the most significant markers to specific identified phenogroups. Pathway analysis suggested differences in immune response, autonomic activation, cellular homeostasis and tissue repair mechanisms across the phenogroups.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a comprehensive plasma proteomics approach, our study identified distinct proteomic profiles of HFpEF phenogroups, which in turn suggest specific underlying biological processes. These profiles suggest the involvement of inflammatory activation, tissue injury and regenerative responses, immune modulation and systemic stress signalling as key components of HFpEF pathophysiology.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN-CTR ID: UMIN000021831.