MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.21037/gs-24-55

Медицинская библиотека · Gland surgery · 2024

Lessons learned from follow up of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with artery saving and vein sacrificing.

Chun Jin Ha, Park Sung Eun, Hong Tae Ho

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The Warshaw method as a technique for spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) carries the risk of splenic infarction following splenic artery ligation. This study introduces a modified Warshaw method, which preserves the splenic artery while sacrificing the splenic vein, and compares its outcomes with the traditional Warshaw method.

METHODS

According to the bleeding status during vessel dissection, either the Warshaw method (group W) or the modified Warshaw method (group MW) was used. Guided by preoperative imaging, we utilized the planned modified Warshaw method (group PMW) when the splenic vein was embedded in the pancreatic parenchyma.

RESULTS

Group MW demonstrated a lower incidence of splenic infarction and engorged gastric collaterals than group W (6.3% vs. 69.8%, P<0.001; 25.0% vs. 55.8%, P=0.003, respectively). There were no significant differences in perioperative changes of splenic volume between the two groups. Group PMW experienced less estimated blood loss than group W (71.9±59.13 vs. 357.9±447.72 cc, P=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

The planned modified Warshaw method is an efficient and safe technique, resulting in lower estimated blood loss and favorable outcomes concerning splenic infarction and gastric collaterals than the Warshaw method without inducing congestive splenomegaly.

Для цитирования: Chun Jin Ha, Park Sung Eun, Hong Tae Ho. Lessons learned from follow up of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with artery saving and vein sacrificing.. Gland surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.21037/gs-24-55.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.