MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250204

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical neuropsychiatry · 2025

Repetitive Negative Thinking in University Students with Specific Learning Disorder: Does Gender Matter?

Scorza Maristella, Camia Michela, Benassi Erika, Angelini Damiano, Ciaramidaro Angela, Giovagnoli Sara

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To date, the literature on repetitive negative thinking (RNT), rumination and worry, in students with Specific Learning Disorder (SLD) is still scant. This study seeks to deeply examine those variables in university students with and without SLD, focusing on the differences between males and females.

METHOD: A survey was administered to 107 university students between 18 and 31 years (mean age=21,56; SD=2,60). Of these, 65 were typically developing (TD) and 42 had a diagnosis of SLD. Participants responded to the Ruminative Response Scale (RRS) and the Penn-State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ). Anxious and depressive symptoms were also assessed.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found between university students with and without SLD on all the scales except for PSWQ. Regression analyses reported that rumination significantly affected depression and anxiety whereas worry seemed to have a role only in anxiety. Finally, female students with SLD showed higher levels of internalizing symptoms among all the subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

The results give psychologists a greater understanding of RNT in university students with SLD, suggesting the importance of including those psychological processes in the clinical assessment.

Для цитирования: Scorza Maristella, Camia Michela, Benassi Erika, Angelini Damiano, Ciaramidaro Angela, Giovagnoli Sara. Repetitive Negative Thinking in University Students with Specific Learning Disorder: Does Gender Matter?. Clinical neuropsychiatry. 2025. DOI: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250204.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.