Wilderness & environmental medicine · 2013
Exercising in a hot environment: which T-shirt to wear?
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sperlich Billy, Born Dennis-Peter, Lefter Marie Denise, Holmberg Hans-Christer
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate thermoregulatory, cardiorespiratory, metabolic, and perceptual responses while running in a hot environment (31.7° ± 1.0°C; 42% ± 3% relative humidity) and wearing T-shirts made from different fiber types.
METHODS: Eight well-trained men performed 4 tests wearing either a T-shirt made of 100% polyester with 4, 6, or 8 channels, or one made of 100% cotton. Each test consisted of 30 minutes running at 70% of peak oxygen uptake, followed by a ramp test to exhaustion and 15 minutes of recovery.
RESULTS: There were no differences in skin, core, and body temperatures between fiber types during submaximal and high-intensity running (best P = .08). During recovery, body temperature and shivering/sweating sensations were lower when wearing 4- and 6-channel fibers (P ≤ .04) compared with cotton. The relative humidity at the chest and back were lower for all polyester T-shirts compared with cotton during and after submaximal and maximal running (P ≤ .007). Heart rate (best P = .10), oxygen uptake (P = .95), respiratory exchange ratio (best P = .93), ventilation (best P = .99), and blood lactate concentration (best P = .97) did not differ between the fiber types. Nor were any differences in time to exhaustion (best P = .76), ratings of perceived exertion (best P = .09), thermal sensation (best P = .07), or sensation of clothing wetness (best P = .36) discovered.
CONCLUSIONS: Although statistical analysis revealed lower shivering/sweating sensations while wearing 4- and 6-channel fiber shirts during recovery, with an improved chest and back microenvironment for all polyester T-shirts, the question remains whether these differences are of any practical relevance because the performance of the well-trained men was unaffected.
METHODS: Eight well-trained men performed 4 tests wearing either a T-shirt made of 100% polyester with 4, 6, or 8 channels, or one made of 100% cotton. Each test consisted of 30 minutes running at 70% of peak oxygen uptake, followed by a ramp test to exhaustion and 15 minutes of recovery.
RESULTS: There were no differences in skin, core, and body temperatures between fiber types during submaximal and high-intensity running (best P = .08). During recovery, body temperature and shivering/sweating sensations were lower when wearing 4- and 6-channel fibers (P ≤ .04) compared with cotton. The relative humidity at the chest and back were lower for all polyester T-shirts compared with cotton during and after submaximal and maximal running (P ≤ .007). Heart rate (best P = .10), oxygen uptake (P = .95), respiratory exchange ratio (best P = .93), ventilation (best P = .99), and blood lactate concentration (best P = .97) did not differ between the fiber types. Nor were any differences in time to exhaustion (best P = .76), ratings of perceived exertion (best P = .09), thermal sensation (best P = .07), or sensation of clothing wetness (best P = .36) discovered.
CONCLUSIONS: Although statistical analysis revealed lower shivering/sweating sensations while wearing 4- and 6-channel fiber shirts during recovery, with an improved chest and back microenvironment for all polyester T-shirts, the question remains whether these differences are of any practical relevance because the performance of the well-trained men was unaffected.