Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
The performance of growth charts in well term newborns in screening for hypoglycemia.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Khalil Marwa A, D'Aversa Samantha, Lozy Tara, Spillane Nicole T
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of Fenton Growth Chart (FGC) with WHO Growth Chart (WGC) to identify term infants at risk for hypoglycemia.
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of infants screened for hypoglycemia due to SGA or LGA status determined by FGC and/or WGC.
RESULTS: Nine hundred and seventy infants were included. There was 47.7% agreement between growth charts. A total of 283 (29.2%) newborns developed hypoglycemia. Of those with hypoglycemia, 53.7% were identified by both charts. WGC was more sensitive for all categories of hypoglycemia examined; hypoglycemia (81.3% [CI 76.2-86.7] vs 72.4% [CI 66.8-77.6]), severe hypoglycemia (80.8% [CI 67.5-90.4] vs 71.2% [CI 56.9-82.9]), and hypoglycemia requiring NICU transfer (88.5% [CI 69.9-97.6] vs 65.4% [CI 44.2-82.8). The FGC was more specific for all hypoglycemia categories.
CONCLUSIONS: There was poor agreement between WGC and FGC for hypoglycemia in term infants. The WGC was more sensitive in detecting hypoglycemia and was non-inferior to the FGC.
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of infants screened for hypoglycemia due to SGA or LGA status determined by FGC and/or WGC.
RESULTS: Nine hundred and seventy infants were included. There was 47.7% agreement between growth charts. A total of 283 (29.2%) newborns developed hypoglycemia. Of those with hypoglycemia, 53.7% were identified by both charts. WGC was more sensitive for all categories of hypoglycemia examined; hypoglycemia (81.3% [CI 76.2-86.7] vs 72.4% [CI 66.8-77.6]), severe hypoglycemia (80.8% [CI 67.5-90.4] vs 71.2% [CI 56.9-82.9]), and hypoglycemia requiring NICU transfer (88.5% [CI 69.9-97.6] vs 65.4% [CI 44.2-82.8). The FGC was more specific for all hypoglycemia categories.
CONCLUSIONS: There was poor agreement between WGC and FGC for hypoglycemia in term infants. The WGC was more sensitive in detecting hypoglycemia and was non-inferior to the FGC.