MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/028418501127346413

Медицинская библиотека · Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) · 2001

MR and other imaging methods in the investigation of mycetomas.

Czechowski J, Nork M, Haas D, Lestringant G, Ekelund L

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To report features of mycetomas (actino- and eumycetoma infection), which belong to the so-called rare bone infections, as evaluated by MR and other imaging methods and to assess chemotherapy treatment.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

Twenty patients (average age 57 years) were diagnosed by different modalities. Analyses of 57 plain films, 31 three-phase bone scans, 28 CT and 35 MR examinations were performed. The MR protocol included T1-weighting without and with contrast, T2-weighted, proton density and fat suppressing sequences.

RESULTS

Signs of chronic osteomyelitis were seen in plain films of 10 patients (50%), but the healing process was difficult to assess. Bone scintigraphy was positive in 12 patients (60%). In 14 patients (70%), CT could demonstrate bone lesions, but the healing process was difficult to estimate in 4 patients. MR imaging provided accurate diagnostic information in 15 cases (75%). In 16 patients (80%), small lesions could be identified due to grains, which seemed to differentiate mycetoma from other infections and tumorous lesions. MR examination gave definitive answer about the healing process in 18 cases (90%).

CONCLUSION

MR investigation was superior to the other imaging techniques in the evaluation of mycetoma and the assessment of therapy.

Для цитирования: Czechowski J, Nork M, Haas D, Lestringant G, Ekelund L. MR and other imaging methods in the investigation of mycetomas.. Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987). 2001. DOI: 10.1080/028418501127346413.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.