MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2460/ajvr.25.01.0035

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of veterinary research · 2025

Foam-based depopulation methods of swine differ from water submersion based on computed tomography findings and postmortem lesions.

Park Janice Y, Campler Magnus R, Kieffer Justin D, Aarnes Turi K, Green Eric M, Bailey Denise, Culhane Marie R, Arruda Andréia G, Bowman Andrew S

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the extent of fluid incursion throughout the respiratory tract of anesthetized pigs terminated using 3 different depopulation methods compared to termination by water submersion (H2O).

METHODS

Inclusion criteria included pigs aged approximately 40 days. The study occurred over 2 consecutive days during spring. Pigs were anesthetized and terminated using their assigned method: water-based foam, high-expansion nitrogen foam, carbon dioxide gas, or H2O. Respiratory tracts were evaluated 3 ways: CT, gross examination, and histopathology. Immediately after death, pigs were CT scanned, and opacity changes were scored. After gross examination, representative tissues were scored microscopically.

RESULTS

48 pigs were assigned to 4 treatment groups of 12 pigs each. Compared to all other methods, H2O had higher odds of increased opacities on CT in several proximal structures and bronchi and pulmonary parenchyma of multiple lung lobes. All groups had pulmonary petechiae to regional hemorrhages and subpleural hemorrhages. Emphysema aquosum was observed exclusively in H2O pigs (4 of 12 [33.3%]). Histologically, carbon dioxide gas had 97.8% decreased odds of pulmonary hemorrhage compared to H2O after accounting for sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Postmortem lesions and CT opacity patterns associated with water-based foam and high-expansion nitrogen foam are dissimilar to H2O. Foam-based methods involve mechanistic differences from drowning through either environmental or occlusional anoxia, not overt fluid inundation of airways.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Foam-based methods are valuable candidates for US swine production and must be separated from the mislabel of drowning. Our findings provide new information regarding large-scale depopulation tools for emergency response efforts.

Для цитирования: Park Janice Y, Campler Magnus R, Kieffer Justin D, Aarnes Turi K, Green Eric M, Bailey Denise, Culhane Marie R, Arruda Andréia G, Bowman Andrew S. Foam-based depopulation methods of swine differ from water submersion based on computed tomography findings and postmortem lesions.. American journal of veterinary research. 2025. DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.25.01.0035.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.