MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983) · 1995

[Clinical and bacteriological aspects of nocardiasis. 9 cases].

Bani-Sadr F, Hamidou M, Raffi F, Chamoux C, Caillon J, Freland C

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Nocardial infection is usually localized in the immunocompetent patient and occurs as an opportunistic disseminated infection in about half of the cases in immunoincompetents patients.

METHODS

We report a retrospective assessment of 9 cases of nocardial infection diagnosed between January 1991 and February 1994.

RESULTS

Six of the patients were immunodepressed: 3 had a disseminated infection with pulmonary (n = 2), brain (n = 2), skin (n = 3) and/or ocular (n = 1) localizations. There were 3 immunocompetent patients with an isolated local infection: skin and bone mycetoma, knee joint and lung. Diagnosis was made on samples obtained invasively in 7 patients. Nocardia asteroides was isolated in 5 patients, N. farcinica in 3 and N. caviae in 1. These organisms showed in vitro sensitivity to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid 5/9, cefotaxime 5/9 (0/3 for N. farcinica), imipeneme 7/9, amikacin 8/8, minocyclin 5/8, pefloxacin 0/8 and trimethoprime-sulfamethoxazol (TMP-SMX) 3/9. Clinical outcome was favourable in all cases and was not always correlated with laboratory sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

TMP-SMX remains the reference antibiotic. For one patient, only TMP-SMX (resistant in vitro) was effective; with all the other antibiotic tried (sensitive in vivo) treatment failed.

Для цитирования: Bani-Sadr F, Hamidou M, Raffi F, Chamoux C, Caillon J, Freland C. [Clinical and bacteriological aspects of nocardiasis. 9 cases].. Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983). 1995.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.