International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction · 2009
Arcus-anchored acellular dermal graft compared to anterior colporrhaphy for stage II cystoceles and beyond.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Botros Sylvia M, Sand Peter K, Beaumont Jennifer L, Abramov Yoram, Miller Jay James, Goldberg Roger P
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study is to compare acellular dermal matrix to standard colporrhaphy for cystocele repair.
METHODS: One hundred two patients with greater than or equal to stage II anterior prolapse (Aa or Ba 0) who underwent anterior colporrhaphy with acellular dermal implant attached to the arcus between October 2003 and February 2007 were compared to 89 controls who received standard anterior colporrhaphy. Objective recurrence was defined as greater than or equal to stage II (Aa or Ba -1).
RESULTS: The dermal graft and colporrhaphy groups were comparable in age, parity, body mass index, and concomitant surgeries except hysteropexy and hysterectomy. Regression was performed for possible confounders. Postoperatively, 14 (19%) recurrences were identified in the dermal graft group vs. 26 (43%) in the colporrhaphy group (p = 0.004). Two patients underwent reoperations for cystocele recurrence in the study group vs. four in the control group. Time to normal voiding, subjective stress urinary incontinence, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay did not differ between groups.
CONCLUSION: Dermal acellular matrix provides benefit over standard colporrhaphy.
METHODS: One hundred two patients with greater than or equal to stage II anterior prolapse (Aa or Ba 0) who underwent anterior colporrhaphy with acellular dermal implant attached to the arcus between October 2003 and February 2007 were compared to 89 controls who received standard anterior colporrhaphy. Objective recurrence was defined as greater than or equal to stage II (Aa or Ba -1).
RESULTS: The dermal graft and colporrhaphy groups were comparable in age, parity, body mass index, and concomitant surgeries except hysteropexy and hysterectomy. Regression was performed for possible confounders. Postoperatively, 14 (19%) recurrences were identified in the dermal graft group vs. 26 (43%) in the colporrhaphy group (p = 0.004). Two patients underwent reoperations for cystocele recurrence in the study group vs. four in the control group. Time to normal voiding, subjective stress urinary incontinence, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay did not differ between groups.
CONCLUSION: Dermal acellular matrix provides benefit over standard colporrhaphy.