A Comparison of the Efficacy of Cannulated Screws against Modified Tension Band Wire in the Management of Slightly Displaced Fractures of the Patella: A Novel Technique.

AIM: The study aimed to compare the outcomes of Open Reduction and Cannulated Screw Fixation (ORCF) and Open Reduction and Tension Band Wire Fixation (ORTF) for treating minimally displaced patellar fractures, with the intention to discern the more efficacious surgical method in terms of various clinical and radiographic parameters.

METHODS

The research was a retrospective controlled trial encompassing 63 patients, culminating in a final data set of 52 patients with transverse patellar fractures with less than 8 mm of displacement. Patients were assessed postoperatively at three, six, and twelve months using measures such as the Lysholm score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, and goniometry for active knee extensions and flexion. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0.

RESULTS

Results indicated superior clinical outcomes for the ORCF group at twelve months post-treatment, with notable higher Lysholm scores and lower VAS scores for pain at three-, six-, and twelve-month intervals. The ORCF group also demonstrated improved flexion and range of motion, with an average fracture healing time of 2.65 months and significantly lower complication rates, compared to the ORTF group.

CONCLUSIONS

The ORCF method, leveraging headless compression screws and cerclage wire fixation, emerges as a promising approach for managing minimally displaced transverse patellar fractures, potentially offering improved clinical results and patient satisfaction in comparison to the traditional ORTF method. Further expansive and diverse studies are warranted to substantiate these findings.