Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2024
Utility of KIT Mutations in Myeloid Neoplasms Without Documented Systemic Mastocytosis to Detect Hidden Mast Cells in Bone Marrow.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim Do Hwan, Jia Fuli, Patel Keyur P, Bose Prithviraj, Wang Sa A, Bueso-Ramos Carlos, Ok Chi Young
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: KIT p.D816 mutation is strongly associated with systemic mastocytosis (SM). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is now routinely performed in almost all bone marrow sample and KIT mutations are detected from patients who are not known or suspected to have SM. Therefore, we wanted to assess if KIT mutations in this patient population are associated with unsuspected SM.
METHODS: We searched NGS result in our institution with positive result for KIT mutation from patients with known/suspected myeloid neoplasms. Patients with previously documented history of systemic mastocytosis were excluded. Bone marrow biopsies from patients with KIT mutation were assessed with immunohistochemical stains for CD117 and mast cell tryptase (MST).
RESULTS: Bone marrow biopsies were assessed with immunohistochemical stains for CD117 and mast cell tryptase (n = 49). Most patients had acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 38) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML, n = 6). Immunohistochemical stains for CD117 and tryptase were performed in all 49 patients. A total of 4 patients (8.2%) showed mast cell nodules where spindled shaped mast cells were present, meeting the WHO criteria for SM. All four patients had KIT p.D816V mutation and had high mutant allelic frequency (∼ 50%) except one patient (1%).
CONCLUSION: We discovered approximately 8% of patients who had myeloid neoplasms with unexpected KIT mutations fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for systemic mastocytosis after additional immunohistochemical studies. Our data support that application of additional immunohistochemical studies is recommended to identify underrecognized SM when KIT mutations are found by molecular assays.
METHODS: We searched NGS result in our institution with positive result for KIT mutation from patients with known/suspected myeloid neoplasms. Patients with previously documented history of systemic mastocytosis were excluded. Bone marrow biopsies from patients with KIT mutation were assessed with immunohistochemical stains for CD117 and mast cell tryptase (MST).
RESULTS: Bone marrow biopsies were assessed with immunohistochemical stains for CD117 and mast cell tryptase (n = 49). Most patients had acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 38) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML, n = 6). Immunohistochemical stains for CD117 and tryptase were performed in all 49 patients. A total of 4 patients (8.2%) showed mast cell nodules where spindled shaped mast cells were present, meeting the WHO criteria for SM. All four patients had KIT p.D816V mutation and had high mutant allelic frequency (∼ 50%) except one patient (1%).
CONCLUSION: We discovered approximately 8% of patients who had myeloid neoplasms with unexpected KIT mutations fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for systemic mastocytosis after additional immunohistochemical studies. Our data support that application of additional immunohistochemical studies is recommended to identify underrecognized SM when KIT mutations are found by molecular assays.