Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2018
The Role of Functional Respiratory Imaging in Treatment Selection of Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Down Syndrome.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Slaats Monique A L J, Loterman Dieter, van Holsbeke Cedric, Vos Wim, Van Hoorenbeeck Kim, de Backer Jan, de Backer Wilfried, Wojciechowski Marek, Boudewyns An, Verhulst Stijn
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVES: The complexity of the pathogenesis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children with Down syndrome (DS) is illustrated by a prevalence of residual OSA after adenotonsillectomy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether upper airway imaging combined with computation fluid dynamics could characterize treatment outcome after adenotonsillectomy in these children.
METHODS: Children with DS and OSA were prospectively included. All children underwent an evaluation of the upper airway and an ultra-low dose computed tomography scan of the upper airway before adenotonsillectomy. The upper airway tract was extracted from the scan and combined with computational fluid dynamics. Results were evaluated using control polysomnography after adenotonsillectomy.
RESULTS: Thirty-three children were included: 18 boys, age 4.3 ± 2.3 years, median body mass index z-score 0.6 (-2.9 to 3.0), and median obstructive apnea-hypopnea index was 15.7 (3-70) events/h. The minimal upper airway cross-sectional area was significantly smaller in children with more severe OSA (P = .03). Nineteen children underwent a second polysomnography after adenotonsillectomy. Seventy-nine percent had persistent OSA (obstructive apneahypopnea index > 2 events/h). A greater than 50% decrease in obstructive apnea-hypopnea index was observed in 79% and these children had a significantly higher volume of the regions below the tonsils.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to characterize treatment outcome in children with DS and OSA using computed tomography upper airway imaging. At baseline, children with more severe OSA had a smaller upper airway. Children with a less favorable response to adenotonsillectomy had a smaller volume of regions below the tonsils, which could be due to enlargement of the lingual tonsils, glossoptosis, or macroglossia.
COMMENTARY: A commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 501.
METHODS: Children with DS and OSA were prospectively included. All children underwent an evaluation of the upper airway and an ultra-low dose computed tomography scan of the upper airway before adenotonsillectomy. The upper airway tract was extracted from the scan and combined with computational fluid dynamics. Results were evaluated using control polysomnography after adenotonsillectomy.
RESULTS: Thirty-three children were included: 18 boys, age 4.3 ± 2.3 years, median body mass index z-score 0.6 (-2.9 to 3.0), and median obstructive apnea-hypopnea index was 15.7 (3-70) events/h. The minimal upper airway cross-sectional area was significantly smaller in children with more severe OSA (P = .03). Nineteen children underwent a second polysomnography after adenotonsillectomy. Seventy-nine percent had persistent OSA (obstructive apneahypopnea index > 2 events/h). A greater than 50% decrease in obstructive apnea-hypopnea index was observed in 79% and these children had a significantly higher volume of the regions below the tonsils.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to characterize treatment outcome in children with DS and OSA using computed tomography upper airway imaging. At baseline, children with more severe OSA had a smaller upper airway. Children with a less favorable response to adenotonsillectomy had a smaller volume of regions below the tonsils, which could be due to enlargement of the lingual tonsils, glossoptosis, or macroglossia.
COMMENTARY: A commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 501.