International journal of surgery case reports · 2026
Angiofibroma of the maxillary gingiva: a rare case report and review of the literature.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mahlobi Ashraf, Sleman Nadim, Kochaji Nabil, Kamali Jenan, Alsayel Daham, Aldarwish Qasem
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Angiofibromas are benign fibrovascular neoplasms that rarely involve the oral cavity.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 36-year-old female presented with a painless swelling on the buccal gingiva adjacent to the right maxillary second molar. Examination revealed a solitary, sessile, oval mass measuring 1.5 cm × 1.2 cm × 1.0 cm. The lesion was excised under local anesthesia. Histopathology confirmed an angiofibroma, showing non-keratinized hyperplastic epithelium overlying a fibrous stroma containing numerous newly formed capillaries. Healing was uneventful, with no recurrence at 1 year.
CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Oral angiofibromas mimic common lesions such as fibromas, necessitating histopathological confirmation. Differential diagnoses include solitary fibrous tumors and spindle cell lipomas. Complete local excision is curative.
CONCLUSION: This rare case of maxillary gingival angiofibroma underscores the importance of histopathological evaluation for definitive diagnosis. Complete excision yields excellent outcomes.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 36-year-old female presented with a painless swelling on the buccal gingiva adjacent to the right maxillary second molar. Examination revealed a solitary, sessile, oval mass measuring 1.5 cm × 1.2 cm × 1.0 cm. The lesion was excised under local anesthesia. Histopathology confirmed an angiofibroma, showing non-keratinized hyperplastic epithelium overlying a fibrous stroma containing numerous newly formed capillaries. Healing was uneventful, with no recurrence at 1 year.
CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Oral angiofibromas mimic common lesions such as fibromas, necessitating histopathological confirmation. Differential diagnoses include solitary fibrous tumors and spindle cell lipomas. Complete local excision is curative.
CONCLUSION: This rare case of maxillary gingival angiofibroma underscores the importance of histopathological evaluation for definitive diagnosis. Complete excision yields excellent outcomes.