DOI 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20250006
Suicidal Ideation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Suicidal ideation has not been extensively studied in spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs). The authors examined whether individuals with SCAs have increased suicidal ideation and related factors.
METHODS
The authors studied patients with genetically confirmed SCAs enrolled in the Clinical Research Consortium for the Study of Cerebellar Ataxia cohort, examining the percentages of patients with SCA subtypes 1, 2, 3, and 6 who reported suicidal ideation and comparing findings with nationally representative data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). Clinical characteristics that may contribute to suicidal ideation in SCAs, including age, disease duration, sex, ataxia severity, depression, and SCA subtype, were also studied.
RESULTS
Suicidal ideation was present among 12% of 769 patients with SCAs and 4.3% of individuals in the general population recorded in the NSDUH. Compared with individuals in the general population, SCA patients had higher odds of suicidal ideation (OR=2.72). Compared with patients with SCA without suicidal ideation, patients with SCA and suicidal ideation had a longer disease duration (mean±SD=13.1±8.2 years vs. 11.2±9.4 years), more severe ataxia (Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia mean score=15.9±8.6 vs. 12.9±7.6), and more severe depression. Having suicidal ideation at baseline significantly increased the odds of suicidality later in the disease course (OR=58.73, 95% CI=36.00-98.40).
CONCLUSIONS
Suicidal ideation was more prevalent among patients with SCAs than in the general population. The findings of this study underscore the importance of continuous suicidal risk screening among individuals with SCAs and the need for effective depression management.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.