Ertapenem-Induced Neurotoxicity: A Literature Review of Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Neurotoxicity is a rare adverse event for ertapenem. Given the limited evidence, large patient data are needed to aid in the identification and management of this fatal complication. Aim of the review, we summarize the characteristics, risk factors, and treatment of ertapenem-induced neurotoxicity.
METHODS
Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane library, Wanfang, CNKI, China VIP database were searched up from 31 October 2001 to 31 December 2022. All articles concerning neurotoxicity induced by ertapenem were included. The retrieved articles were screened by two experienced clinicians by reading the titles, abstracts, and full texts.
RESULTS
A total of 66 patients were included, with a median age of 71.5 years (range 40-92), of whom 45 (68.2%) were male. Twelve patients (18.2%) received irrational doses (exceeding the recommended dose), and 30 patients (45.5%) had chronic renal insufficiency. The median time to symptom onset was 5 (range 1-14). Epileptiform seizures (42.4%), visual hallucinations (36.4%), altered mental status (25.8%), and confusion (22.7%) were the most common symptoms of ertapenem-induced neurotoxicity. Of the 29 patients with reported albumin levels, 25 had serum albumin <3.5 g/dl. Ertapenem was discontinued in 95.5% of patients, and 90.9% recovered completely. Median time to symptom recovery was 7 days (range 1-42) after intervention including antiepileptic administration, or hemodialysis.
CONCLUSION
Neurotoxicity is a rare adverse event for ertapenem, especially in patients with advanced age, renal insufficiency, pre-existing neurological disease, and hypoalbuminemia. This adverse reaction usually resolves with medication interruption, or antiepileptic administration and hemodialysis.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.