British journal of anaesthesia · 2015
Prediction of fluid responsiveness using a non-invasive cardiac output monitor in children undergoing cardiac surgery.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee J-H, No H-J, Song I-K, Kim H-S, Kim C-S, Kim J-T
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the ability of a non-invasive cardiac output monitoring device (NICOM) to predict fluid responsiveness in paediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
METHODS: Children aged <5 yr undergoing congenital heart surgery were included. Once the sternum had been closed after repair of the congenital heart defect, 10 ml kg(-1) colloid solution was administered for volume expansion. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) was performed to measure stroke volume (SV) and respiratory variation in aortic blood flow peak velocity (ΔV(peak)) before and after volume expansion. Haemodynamic and NICOM variables, including SV(NICOM), stroke volume variance (SVV(NICOM)), cardiac index (CI(NICOM)), and percentage change in thoracic fluid content compared with baseline (TFCd0%), were also recorded. Patients in whom the stroke volume index (SVI), measured using TOE, increased by >15% were defined as fluid responders.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were included (13 responders and 16 non-responders). Before volume expansion, only ΔV(peak) differed between groups (P=0.036). The SVV(NICOM), HR, and central venous pressure did not predict fluid responsiveness, but ΔV(peak) did. The CI(NICOM) was not correlated with CI(TOE) (r=0.107, P=0.43). Using Bland-Altman analysis, the mean bias between CI(TOE) and CI(NICOM) was 0.89 litre min(-1) m(-2), with a precision of 1.14 litre min(-1) m(-2). Trending ability of NICOM for SVI and CI was poor when TOE was a reference method.
CONCLUSIONS: The SVV(NICOM) did not predict fluid responsiveness in paediatric patients during cardiac surgery. In addition, there was no correlation between CI(TOE) and CI(NICOM). Fluid management guided by NICOM should be performed carefully.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01996956.
METHODS: Children aged <5 yr undergoing congenital heart surgery were included. Once the sternum had been closed after repair of the congenital heart defect, 10 ml kg(-1) colloid solution was administered for volume expansion. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) was performed to measure stroke volume (SV) and respiratory variation in aortic blood flow peak velocity (ΔV(peak)) before and after volume expansion. Haemodynamic and NICOM variables, including SV(NICOM), stroke volume variance (SVV(NICOM)), cardiac index (CI(NICOM)), and percentage change in thoracic fluid content compared with baseline (TFCd0%), were also recorded. Patients in whom the stroke volume index (SVI), measured using TOE, increased by >15% were defined as fluid responders.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were included (13 responders and 16 non-responders). Before volume expansion, only ΔV(peak) differed between groups (P=0.036). The SVV(NICOM), HR, and central venous pressure did not predict fluid responsiveness, but ΔV(peak) did. The CI(NICOM) was not correlated with CI(TOE) (r=0.107, P=0.43). Using Bland-Altman analysis, the mean bias between CI(TOE) and CI(NICOM) was 0.89 litre min(-1) m(-2), with a precision of 1.14 litre min(-1) m(-2). Trending ability of NICOM for SVI and CI was poor when TOE was a reference method.
CONCLUSIONS: The SVV(NICOM) did not predict fluid responsiveness in paediatric patients during cardiac surgery. In addition, there was no correlation between CI(TOE) and CI(NICOM). Fluid management guided by NICOM should be performed carefully.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01996956.