Journal of occupational health · 2025
Developing a device to determine the permeation of chemicals through whole protective boots.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Miyauchi Hiroyuki, Yamanoto Shinobu, Aoki Takamasa
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To develop a device to evaluate the permeation resistance of chemical-protective boots continuously in contact with liquid chemicals, and to compare the permeation time of the component material test pieces with the permeation time of the whole boot and thus evaluate its performance.
METHODS: The permeation time was calculated for toluene, dichloromethane, and acetone in 4 types of boot, according to Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) T 8117:2005.
RESULTS: The permeation test for whole boots showed shorter permeation times than those of the component materials, according to JIS T 8117:2005. The permeation time of toluene was more than twice that of boots C and D. The permeation time of dichloromethane was more than twice that of boots A and C and more than 3 times shorter for boot A.
CONCLUSIONS: The differences between the whole-boot tests and the material tests were thought to be related to variations in thickness, type of material, difference in adhesion, and penetration from pinwheels. This method enables the determination of the permeation of chemicals and other performance characteristics of the whole boot, which cannot be determined using testing of material specimens alone. By using this device for testing, appropriate boots that are protective against specific chemicals and can prevent chemically induced damage to the feet can be more efficiently selected.
METHODS: The permeation time was calculated for toluene, dichloromethane, and acetone in 4 types of boot, according to Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) T 8117:2005.
RESULTS: The permeation test for whole boots showed shorter permeation times than those of the component materials, according to JIS T 8117:2005. The permeation time of toluene was more than twice that of boots C and D. The permeation time of dichloromethane was more than twice that of boots A and C and more than 3 times shorter for boot A.
CONCLUSIONS: The differences between the whole-boot tests and the material tests were thought to be related to variations in thickness, type of material, difference in adhesion, and penetration from pinwheels. This method enables the determination of the permeation of chemicals and other performance characteristics of the whole boot, which cannot be determined using testing of material specimens alone. By using this device for testing, appropriate boots that are protective against specific chemicals and can prevent chemically induced damage to the feet can be more efficiently selected.