European journal of endocrinology · 2002
Chromosomal imbalances identified by comparative genomic hybridization in sporadic parathyroid adenomas.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Garcia Juan Luis, Tardio Juan C, Gutierrez Norma Carmen, Gonzalez Maria Belen, Polo Jose Ramon, Hernandez Jesus Maria, Menarguez Javier
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To identify chromosomal gains and losses in sporadic parathyroid adenomas (PAs).
METHODS: Fourteen sporadic PAs were studied by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).
RESULTS: The fourteen studied PAs showed chromosomal imbalances. All cases except one exhibited two or more abnormalities. Chromosomal gains were found in all cases, and three cases (21%) also presented chromosomal losses. Genomic amplification was not observed. Chromosome 9 was involved in ten cases. Recurrent genetic gain was found on 9p22-24 and on 9q34, each in 6 of 14 cases (43%). Other recurrent gains included Xq26 in 6 PAs (43%) and 4q21-28 and 8p22-23, each in 4 of 14 cases (29%). Regions of recurrent genetic loss involved whole chromosome 11 and 20q12-13, each in 2 of 14 cases (14%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show chromosomal imbalances in all sporadic PAs studied by CGH, partly confirming previous reports, with the exception that we observed more chromosomal gains than losses. Several regions (9p22-24, 9q34, Xq26, 4q21-28, and 8p22-23) probably deserve further investigation in order to discard the presence of genes involved in parathyroid tumorigenesis.
METHODS: Fourteen sporadic PAs were studied by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).
RESULTS: The fourteen studied PAs showed chromosomal imbalances. All cases except one exhibited two or more abnormalities. Chromosomal gains were found in all cases, and three cases (21%) also presented chromosomal losses. Genomic amplification was not observed. Chromosome 9 was involved in ten cases. Recurrent genetic gain was found on 9p22-24 and on 9q34, each in 6 of 14 cases (43%). Other recurrent gains included Xq26 in 6 PAs (43%) and 4q21-28 and 8p22-23, each in 4 of 14 cases (29%). Regions of recurrent genetic loss involved whole chromosome 11 and 20q12-13, each in 2 of 14 cases (14%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show chromosomal imbalances in all sporadic PAs studied by CGH, partly confirming previous reports, with the exception that we observed more chromosomal gains than losses. Several regions (9p22-24, 9q34, Xq26, 4q21-28, and 8p22-23) probably deserve further investigation in order to discard the presence of genes involved in parathyroid tumorigenesis.