Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2024
Causal relationship between gestational diabetes and preeclampsia: A bidirectional mendelian randomization analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yang Xiaofeng, QimeiZhong, Huang Mengwei, Li Li, Tang Chunyan, Luo Shujuan, Wang Lan, Qi Hongbo
Аннотация
AIMS: The study aimed to explore the potential causal link between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and preeclampsia (PE) using a bidirectional mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.
MATERIALS: We conducted a bidirectional MR analysis to investigate the causal relationship between GDM and PE. Data from public genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for GDM and PE were obtained from the FinnGen consortium. Various MR methods were employed, including inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, and sensitivity analyses. Additionally, a knowledge-based approach identified genes underlying this potential connection.
RESULTS: The IVW method revealed a lack of significant association between GDM and PE (OR: 1.04, 95 % CI: 0.96-1.14; p = 0.275). Conversely, IVW analysis indicated a causal connection from PE to GDM (OR: 1.14, 95 % CI: 1.06-1.23; p < 0.001). Molecular pathway analysis identified 20 key genes, including ASAP2, central to the PE-GDM relationship. Tissue enrichment analysis showed pertinent gene expression in significant tissues. Moreover, lower ASAP2 expression was detected in PE patients' placentas.
CONCLUSIONS: Our bidirectional MR analysis offers evidence supporting a causal link between PE and GDM, elucidating their interconnected pathogenesis. Genetic and knowledge-based insights facilitate a deeper comprehension of these complex pregnancy complications.
MATERIALS: We conducted a bidirectional MR analysis to investigate the causal relationship between GDM and PE. Data from public genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for GDM and PE were obtained from the FinnGen consortium. Various MR methods were employed, including inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, and sensitivity analyses. Additionally, a knowledge-based approach identified genes underlying this potential connection.
RESULTS: The IVW method revealed a lack of significant association between GDM and PE (OR: 1.04, 95 % CI: 0.96-1.14; p = 0.275). Conversely, IVW analysis indicated a causal connection from PE to GDM (OR: 1.14, 95 % CI: 1.06-1.23; p < 0.001). Molecular pathway analysis identified 20 key genes, including ASAP2, central to the PE-GDM relationship. Tissue enrichment analysis showed pertinent gene expression in significant tissues. Moreover, lower ASAP2 expression was detected in PE patients' placentas.
CONCLUSIONS: Our bidirectional MR analysis offers evidence supporting a causal link between PE and GDM, elucidating their interconnected pathogenesis. Genetic and knowledge-based insights facilitate a deeper comprehension of these complex pregnancy complications.