Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2012
Comparison of surgical decompression and local steroid injection in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: 2-year clinical results from a randomized trial.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ly-Pen Domingo, Andréu José-Luis, Millán Isabel, de Blas Gema, Sánchez-Olaso Alberto
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of surgical decompression vs local steroid injection in the treatment of idiopathic CTS.
METHODS: This is an open, prospective, randomized clinical trial. We studied the effects of surgical decompression vs local steroid injection in 163 wrists with a clinical diagnosis and neurophysiological confirmation of CTS, with an extended follow-up of 2 years. The primary end point was the percentage of wrists that reached a ≥ 20% improvement in the visual analogue scale score for nocturnal paraesthesias. Statistical analysis was done by Student's t-test for continuous variables and by chi-square test for categorical variables. Analyses were performed on an intent-to-treat basis. P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Both treatment groups had comparable severity of CTS at baseline. Eighty wrists were randomly assigned to surgical decompression and 83 wrists to local steroid injection. Fifty-five wrists in the surgery group and 48 wrists in the injection group completed the 2-year follow-up. In the intent-to-treat analysis, at 2-year follow-up, 60% of the wrists in the injection group vs 69% in the surgery group reached a 20% response for nocturnal paraesthesias (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that both local steroid injection and surgical decompression are effective treatments in alleviating symptoms in primary CTS at 2-year follow-up. Surgery has an additional benefit in the 2-year follow-up, although clinical relevance of those differences remains to be defined.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials, www.controlled-trials.com, ISRCTN26264638.
METHODS: This is an open, prospective, randomized clinical trial. We studied the effects of surgical decompression vs local steroid injection in 163 wrists with a clinical diagnosis and neurophysiological confirmation of CTS, with an extended follow-up of 2 years. The primary end point was the percentage of wrists that reached a ≥ 20% improvement in the visual analogue scale score for nocturnal paraesthesias. Statistical analysis was done by Student's t-test for continuous variables and by chi-square test for categorical variables. Analyses were performed on an intent-to-treat basis. P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Both treatment groups had comparable severity of CTS at baseline. Eighty wrists were randomly assigned to surgical decompression and 83 wrists to local steroid injection. Fifty-five wrists in the surgery group and 48 wrists in the injection group completed the 2-year follow-up. In the intent-to-treat analysis, at 2-year follow-up, 60% of the wrists in the injection group vs 69% in the surgery group reached a 20% response for nocturnal paraesthesias (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that both local steroid injection and surgical decompression are effective treatments in alleviating symptoms in primary CTS at 2-year follow-up. Surgery has an additional benefit in the 2-year follow-up, although clinical relevance of those differences remains to be defined.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials, www.controlled-trials.com, ISRCTN26264638.