MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s40258-026-01063-1

Медицинская библиотека · Applied health economics and health policy · 2026

Cost-Effectiveness of Maternal RSVpreF Vaccination Compared with Newborn Nirsevimab RSV Prophylaxis or No RSV Prophylaxis in Switzerland.

Bainbridge Jamie, Mealing Stuart, Graham Charlotte, Jenal Mathias, von Dombrowski Nicolas, Dymond Amy

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

RSVpreF is a vaccine that immunises against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), a seasonal respiratory virus, that can lead to lower respiratory tract infections. In Switzerland, RSVpreF is indicated for the passive protection of infants against RSV following maternal immunisation.

OBJECTIVE

The Swiss Federal Office of Public Health commissioned a health technology assessment (HTA) of RSVpreF for maternal vaccination, evaluating the clinical and cost effectiveness of the vaccine compared with nirsevimab (administered directly to newborns and infants) or no RSV prophylaxis. This study reports the cost-effectiveness model developed for the Swiss HTA.

METHODS

The model used a Markov model structure, a 1-year time horizon, a one-month cycle length, a Swiss healthcare payers' perspective, and a 3% discount rate for costs and health benefits. Health states included no RSV infection, RSV infection leading to hospitalisation, primary care visits or emergency department visits, post-RSV infection, and death. MATISSE informed RSVpreF efficacy, and MELODY and HARMONIE informed nirsevimab efficacy. Health outcomes were expressed as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were undertaken to explore the impact of parameter uncertainty on the model results.

RESULTS

When compared with nirsevimab, RSVpreF reduces total costs (CHF -9,878,738) and QALYs (-18.4), with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 536,008 per QALY (N = 38,844). Compared with no RSV prophylaxis, RSVpreF increases total costs (CHF +470,441) and QALYs (+27.1), with an ICER of 17,377 per QALY (N = 38,844).

CONCLUSIONS

RSVpreF is highly likely to be cost-effective versus both comparators at a range of plausible threshold values. The results of the model contributed to guidance updates in Switzerland, with RSVpreF now reimbursed by mandatory health insurance.

Для цитирования: Bainbridge Jamie, Mealing Stuart, Graham Charlotte, Jenal Mathias, von Dombrowski Nicolas, Dymond Amy. Cost-Effectiveness of Maternal RSVpreF Vaccination Compared with Newborn Nirsevimab RSV Prophylaxis or No RSV Prophylaxis in Switzerland.. Applied health economics and health policy. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s40258-026-01063-1.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.