The Alendronate Conundrum: Balancing the Competing Influences for Truly Informed Consent About Drug Safety in an Era of Rapid Change.

This commentary highlights critical decision points regarding the responsibilities of the key stakeholders-pharmaceutical companies, the US Food and Drug Administration, clinicians, and patients-regarding the communication of the risk of a medication. It addresses responsibility for remaining current about emerging drug reactions that often cannot be appreciated during the initial approval period of new drugs and biologics. Further complicating the issue are the medical systems that limit a clinician's time and bandwidth to keep abreast of emerging adverse reactions and to engage in an informed consent process with a lay patient who often has a limited understanding of medical terms and quantitative methods that can provide context for understanding rare complications and adverse drug reactions. Nevertheless, the risk of not finding an amenable way forward for all stakeholders is a descent into the unending crippling malpractice settlements that will only inexorably raise the costs of health care and encourage the exodus of clinicians from the profession.