MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2026.116989

Медицинская библиотека · Psychiatry research · 2026

Common and distinct patterns of aberrant amygdala functional connectivity in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder: A voxel-wise comparative meta-analysis.

Zhang Lisha, Qin Kun, Pan Nanfang, Xu Haoran, Gong Qiyong

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМетаанализПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

As a central hub of emotional processing, alterations in amygdala functional connectivity (FC) have garnered significant attention in both major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD), which holds promise in identifying differential biomarkers and highlighting their similarities. However, current findings are limited by inconsistency. To address this, we conducted a comparative and conjunction analysis using the Seed-based d Mapping (SDM) toolbox to examine amygdala FC alterations in MDD and BD patients. Our results revealed distinct amygdala FC alterations between MDD and BD were primarily identified in the left temporal pole, cingulate cortex, and left supramarginal gyrus, while shared amygdala FC abnormalities were particularly observed in the fronto-limbic regions and occipitotemporal gyrus. These findings highlight both commonalities and differences in amygdala FC alterations across MDD and BD, providing insights into the underlying pathophysiology of mood disorders and offering potential neural biomarkers for differential diagnosis, thereby aiding in the improvement of treatment strategies.

Для цитирования: Zhang Lisha, Qin Kun, Pan Nanfang, Xu Haoran, Gong Qiyong. Common and distinct patterns of aberrant amygdala functional connectivity in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder: A voxel-wise comparative meta-analysis.. Psychiatry research. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2026.116989.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.