Archives of dermatological research · 2023
Paradoxical effect of epinephrine on lesion redness and vascularity.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nazir Zaeem H, Rishpon Ayelet, Kose Kivanc, Marghoob Nadeem G, Liopyris Konstantinos, Navarrete-Dechent Cristian, Dusza Stephen W, Daoud Alexander, Marghoob Ashfaq A
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Epinephrine is commonly used in combination with local anesthetic (lidocaine/epinephrine) due to its beneficial vasoconstrictive properties. Typically, pallor is appreciated after injection as a sign of effect; however, we observed that some cutaneous malignancies paradoxically revealed increased redness and vascularity after injection of lidocaine/epinephrine. In this study, we investigate this phenomenon among a series of biopsied lesions to identify characteristics of lesions associated with increased redness and/or vascularity.
OBJECTIVES: To determine characteristics of lesions which become redder or more vascular after injection with lidocaine/epinephrine prior to biopsy.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study consisted of a convenience sample of lesions scheduled for biopsy. Lesions were photographed prior to and 7 min after injection of lidocaine/epinephrine as a part of standard care. Two readers blinded to study objectives and histopathological diagnosis assessed lesions for changes in redness and vascular features.
RESULTS: Fifty-four lesions from 47 patients-61.7% male, mean age 64.8 years, age-range 24-91 were included. Thirty-six lesions were biopsy confirmed malignant, with 5 in situ and 31 invasive malignancies; the remaining 18 lesions were benign. In comparison with non-malignant lesions, malignant lesions were associated with an increase in clinically appreciable vascular features after injection of lidocaine/epinephrine, X2 (1) = 21.600, p < 0.001. Further stratification into benign, in situ, and invasive lesions strengthened the association, X2 (1) = 23.272, p < 0.001.
CONCLUSIONS: Combination lidocaine/epinephrine has been shown to paradoxically increase the visibility of vessels seen in cutaneous malignancies. This is consistent with prior literature suggesting aberrant adrenergic signaling in neoangiogenic vessels.
OBJECTIVES: To determine characteristics of lesions which become redder or more vascular after injection with lidocaine/epinephrine prior to biopsy.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study consisted of a convenience sample of lesions scheduled for biopsy. Lesions were photographed prior to and 7 min after injection of lidocaine/epinephrine as a part of standard care. Two readers blinded to study objectives and histopathological diagnosis assessed lesions for changes in redness and vascular features.
RESULTS: Fifty-four lesions from 47 patients-61.7% male, mean age 64.8 years, age-range 24-91 were included. Thirty-six lesions were biopsy confirmed malignant, with 5 in situ and 31 invasive malignancies; the remaining 18 lesions were benign. In comparison with non-malignant lesions, malignant lesions were associated with an increase in clinically appreciable vascular features after injection of lidocaine/epinephrine, X2 (1) = 21.600, p < 0.001. Further stratification into benign, in situ, and invasive lesions strengthened the association, X2 (1) = 23.272, p < 0.001.
CONCLUSIONS: Combination lidocaine/epinephrine has been shown to paradoxically increase the visibility of vessels seen in cutaneous malignancies. This is consistent with prior literature suggesting aberrant adrenergic signaling in neoangiogenic vessels.