MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/nu18081293

Медицинская библиотека · Nutrients · 2026

Comparative Effectiveness of Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Frivaldszky Lőrinc, Obeidat Mahmoud, Hegyi Péter, Kárpáti Csongor, Kobza Zoltán, Ács Nándor, Bánhidy Ferenc, Agócs Gergely, Szentes Boglárka Lilla, Keszthelyi Márton

СтатьяСистематический обзорNetwork Meta-AnalysisСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Background

Nausea and vomiting in pregnancy affects up to 80% of pregnant women and may progress to hyperemesis gravidarum, leading to maternal morbidity and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Despite numerous pharmacological and non-pharmacological options, the comparative efficacy and safety of these interventions remain unclear.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. The databases searched included CENTRAL, PubMed, and EMBASE (up to 28 May 2024). Eligible trials compared interventions with a placebo in pregnant women with nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. The primary outcomes were symptom severity, assessed using validated tools. Safety outcomes included adverse effects. Data were pooled using frequentist pairwise and network meta-analyses. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB2 tool, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the CINeMA framework.

Results

Of 9844 records screened, 24 randomized controlled trials (3017 participants) met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 16 intervention categories. Network analysis ranked quince, vitamin B6 with pomegranate and mint, acupressure P6, dimenhydrinate, and acupuncture combined with doxylamine-pyridoxine as the most effective interventions for reducing symptoms of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy, with considerable uncertainty and low-to-moderate quality of evidence. Reporting of adverse events was limited. Risk of bias was low to moderate. Discussion: Most interventions demonstrated significant benefit over a placebo. However, high heterogeneity and sparse reporting of adverse effects warrant caution when translating these results into clinical practice.

Conclusions

This study indicates that both pharmacological (vitamin B6, metoclopramide, dimenhydrinate) and non-pharmacological (ginger, quince, acupressure, acupuncture) interventions might be effective in reducing symptoms of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy.

Для цитирования: Frivaldszky Lőrinc, Obeidat Mahmoud, Hegyi Péter, Kárpáti Csongor, Kobza Zoltán, Ács Nándor, Bánhidy Ferenc, Agócs Gergely, Szentes Boglárka Lilla, Keszthelyi Márton. Comparative Effectiveness of Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.. Nutrients. 2026. DOI: 10.3390/nu18081293.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.