European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2021
Fibula nail fixation in ankle fractures with significant soft tissue compromise: a retrospective cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Brewer Paul, Murray James, Barr Lynne, Headon Elizabeth, Davies Howard, Chadwick Carolyn, Blundell Chris, Davies Mark
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Intramedullary fixation of lateral malleolar fractures has increased in popularity recently with the introduction of the fibula nail. It has been proposed as an alternative fixation method in fractures to minimise soft tissue injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of those who had an ankle fracture with concurrent significant soft tissue damage, treated with a fibula nail.
METHODS: Details of patients who were managed at our institution using a fibula nail were obtained from the trauma database. The Acumed Fibula Rod System (FRS) was used in all cases. Those who were less than 12 months following injury were excluded. Patients attended a follow-up clinic for measurement of range of movement, radiographs, and to complete MOX-FQ and EQ-5D questionnaires.
RESULTS: Twenty patients were identified. Eleven attended for review in person, and a further eight completed questionnaires (questionnaire response rate 95%). The mean age was 59 years (range 19-91). Twelve fractures were open, all of which were initially managed using an external fixator. One patient developed deep infection necessitating fusion. The mean MOX-FQ and EQ-5D scores were 53.6 and 0.649, respectively, at a median of 40 months post-injury. The mean EQ-VAS was 70. The range of movement of the affected side was significantly less than the unaffected side (p < 0.001 on paired t-test).
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the FRS offers a reliable and acceptable alternative fixation technique for patients who have significant soft tissue injuries.
METHODS: Details of patients who were managed at our institution using a fibula nail were obtained from the trauma database. The Acumed Fibula Rod System (FRS) was used in all cases. Those who were less than 12 months following injury were excluded. Patients attended a follow-up clinic for measurement of range of movement, radiographs, and to complete MOX-FQ and EQ-5D questionnaires.
RESULTS: Twenty patients were identified. Eleven attended for review in person, and a further eight completed questionnaires (questionnaire response rate 95%). The mean age was 59 years (range 19-91). Twelve fractures were open, all of which were initially managed using an external fixator. One patient developed deep infection necessitating fusion. The mean MOX-FQ and EQ-5D scores were 53.6 and 0.649, respectively, at a median of 40 months post-injury. The mean EQ-VAS was 70. The range of movement of the affected side was significantly less than the unaffected side (p < 0.001 on paired t-test).
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the FRS offers a reliable and acceptable alternative fixation technique for patients who have significant soft tissue injuries.